Power Unit Control System for Oscillation Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power units for robot joints struggle to control driving force effectively due to the influence of springiness in power transmission elements and rotational friction, leading to oscillation phenomena, as they do not account for the springiness of these elements or the viscosity of the output shaft.

Innovation Solution

A control system that includes a force detecting unit, displacement motion detecting unit, basic command value determining unit, actuator control unit, and manipulated variable determining unit, which corrects the driving force applied to the element to be driven by accounting for inertial forces and the springiness of the power transmission element, thereby stabilizing the force application and suppressing oscillations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a power transmission element (such as a reduction gear) is used to transmit driving force from the actuator to the spring member, then the driving force can be transmitted effectively, but the springiness of the power transmission element causes oscillation phenomenon in the driving force applied to the element to be driven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving force transmissionVSAvoiddriving force stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using an observer to estimate the state variables (including the influence of springiness) of the power transmission element, and then correcting the actuator output based on these estimates. The control unit adjusts the actuator's driving force according to the estimated springiness influence, thereby suppressing oscillations and stabilizing the driving force applied to the element to be driven.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameters by introducing estimated values of springiness influence as additional control variables. The observer estimates the springiness parameters in real-time, and these estimated parameters are used to dynamically adjust the actuator control commands, transforming the system from open-loop to closed-loop control with respect to the springiness effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If an observer is used to suppress backlash oscillation of the gear, then the oscillation can be suppressed, but the technique does not take into account the influences of rotational friction or viscosity of the output shaft, preventing the driving force from following the desired value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacklash oscillation suppressionVSAvoiddriving force accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the observer's functionality to simultaneously estimate multiple influence factors including springiness, rotational friction, and viscosity effects. Instead of addressing only backlash oscillation, the enhanced observer estimates all relevant disturbance factors, enabling the control system to compensate for multiple sources of error and achieve both oscillation suppression and accurate driving force control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If friction compensation using an observer is implemented, then the friction influence can be compensated, but the springiness of the power transmission element is not taken into account, causing the driving force to develop oscillation phenomenon

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction compensation accuracyVSAvoiddriving force stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the friction compensation function with the springiness compensation function into a unified observer-based control system. The observer simultaneously estimates both friction forces and springiness influences, and the control unit combines both compensation actions in a single control command, thereby achieving both friction compensation and springiness oscillation suppression through an integrated approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The control system ensures high stability in controlling the driving force applied to the element, effectively suppressing oscillations and maintaining the force close to the desired value by compensating for the influences of elastic, frictional, and viscous forces.

Implementation Method 1

a spring member, which receives the driving force of the actuator through the intermediary of a power transmission element, converts the received driving force into an elastic force and imparts the elastic force to the element to be driven

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the power transmission element being configured to exhibit springiness between an input section thereof adjacent to the actuator and an output section thereof adjacent to the spring member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpringiness: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9796087B2Control system for power unit
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9796087B2 patent drawing
  • US9796087B2 patent drawing
  • US9796087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system of a power unit in accordance with the present invention corrects a basic command value of an electric motor 2, which has been determined such that the detection value of a driving force to be applied to a rotary member 5 is converged to a desired value, according to a manipulated variable determined by an observer 16. The electric motor 2 is controlled according to a desired control value after the correction. The observer 16 determines the manipulated variable such that the driving force based on the desired control value is brought close to the resultant force of a force indicated by the rotary member 5 and an inertial force.