Polyphenylene Ether Precipitation via Atomization and Anti-Solvent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for preparing poly(phenylene ether) particles face challenges in controlling particle size, often resulting in threads or fibers instead of particles, and require precise solvent composition control, which is difficult to achieve.

Innovation Solution

The process involves introducing a poly(phenylene ether) solution to a feed tube with an atomizer, followed by atomization and contact with anti-solvents in a mechanically stirred vessel, allowing for controlled addition of anti-solvents to achieve precipitated particles with specific bulk densities and sizes, and includes a system with feed tubes and a condenser for solvent recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical grinding or conventional solvent precipitation is used, then poly(phenylene ether) particles can be prepared, but particle size and size distribution cannot be effectively controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical grinding with a chemical precipitation process using an atomizer and anti-solvent system. The atomizer creates fine droplets that precipitate into controlled particles, eliminating the need for mechanical size reduction while achieving precise particle size control through chemical means rather than mechanical force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls particle size by changing parameters such as anti-solvent addition rate, atomizer pressure, and solution concentration. By systematically adjusting these parameters, the process achieves controlled particle size and distribution without requiring complex mechanical control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional precipitation methods are used, then poly(phenylene ether) can be precipitated, but the bulk density is low and particle uniformity is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle uniformityVSAvoidbulk density
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an atomizer to segment the poly(phenylene ether) solution into fine droplets before precipitation. This segmentation ensures uniform nucleation and growth of particles, resulting in consistent size and shape. The segmented droplets precipitate independently, creating uniform particles with controlled bulk density rather than aggregated irregular masses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an anti-solvent as an intermediary medium to control the precipitation process. The anti-solvent gradually reduces polymer solubility in a controlled manner, allowing uniform particle formation. This intermediary approach prevents rapid aggregation that would lead to poor uniformity and low bulk density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If precise solvent composition control is implemented, then particle formation can be improved, but the process becomes difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle formation controlVSAvoidsolvent composition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the need for precise manual solvent composition control with an automated atomization system. The atomizer mechanically controls the dispersion and precipitation process, substituting complex chemical composition control with simpler physical parameter control (pressure, flow rate) that is easier to operate and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The precipitation process is designed to be self-regulating through the atomizer system. The controlled droplet formation and anti-solvent mixing create automatic feedback that maintains consistent particle formation without requiring continuous manual adjustment of solvent composition, improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of repair

If traditional precipitation processes are used, then poly(phenylene ether) can be produced, but solvent recovery and recycling are not efficiently achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolvent recoveryVSAvoidsolvent recycling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a solvent recovery system that captures and recycles the anti-solvent and other solvents used in the precipitation process. Rather than discarding these solvents, the system condenses and recycles them, reducing waste and energy consumption while maintaining process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method produces poly(phenylene ether) particles with controlled size and size distribution, achieving higher bulk densities and uniformity compared to traditional methods, as demonstrated by increased bulk density and improved particle size distribution.

Implementation Method 1

atomizing the poly(phenylene ether) solution to provide an atomized poly(phenylene ether) solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization:

Implementation Method 2

contacting the atomized poly(phenylene ether) solution with an anti-solvent to provide a slurry comprising a precipitated poly(phenylene ether)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentUS11802184B2Process and apparatus for precipitation of poly (phenylene ether)
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 SHPP GLOBAL TECH BV
  • US11802184B2 patent drawing
  • US11802184B2 patent drawing
  • US11802184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process and system for the precipitation of poly(phenylene ether) is described. Precipitated poly(phenylene ether) obtained by the processes disclosed herein are in the form of poly(phenylene ether) particles having a bulk density of 150 to 500 kg/m3, preferably 250 to 500 kg/m3.