Predictive Speed Capping for Spline Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling industrial robots, particularly in 'manually reduced speed' mode, fail to consistently maintain speed limits during path movements using spline interpolation, leading to potential safety violations and reduced operability.

Innovation Solution

A method that simulates the halting movement of a manipulator at the beginning of each cycle to predict and prevent exceeding predetermined monitoring limits by adjusting the nominal speed to zero, ensuring timely intervention and precise compliance with speed limits, even during complex path movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If spline interpolation is used for path movement to achieve precise and accurate robot travel, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the robot may exceed monitoring limits and safety is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath accuracyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs a simulation of the halting movement before the actual movement begins. By predicting the future state of the manipulator and checking whether monitoring limits would be exceeded, the system takes preliminary action to prevent safety violations while maintaining precise path following through spline interpolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If monitoring limits are strictly enforced to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but robot operability is worsened due to frequent stoppage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By simulating the halting movement in advance, the system identifies potential limit violations before they occur. This allows for proactive speed adjustment that prevents unnecessary stoppages while still ensuring safety, thereby improving operability without compromising reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If speed is reduced to prevent monitoring limit violations, then safety is improved, but productivity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoutput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device dynamically adjusts the nominal speed based on real-time simulation results. Instead of using a fixed reduced speed, the system optimizes speed profiles cycle-by-cycle to maintain maximum safe operation, thereby preserving productivity while ensuring safety compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By predicting future states through simulation, the system can plan speed adjustments in advance rather than reacting to limit violations. This allows for smooth, optimized speed profiles that maintain productivity while preventing safety violations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10220514B2Override-based, predictive speed capping
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 KUKA DEUT GMBH
  • US10220514B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a manipulator, with the method being particularly suitable for the respecting of predetermined monitoring limits. The method operates by initiating a halting movement or a speed capping based on an identified actual override trend, and is thus suitable, in particular, for path movements by means of spline interpolation.