Pressure Differential Steam Injection for SAGD Reservoirs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process for recovering heavy hydrocarbons is economically challenging due to high operating costs and inefficiencies, particularly in thinner reservoirs, where the high steam-to-oil ratio and heat transfer issues limit the economic viability of accessing sufficient resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method with two well pairs, one at higher pressure and one at lower pressure, creating a significant pressure differential to promote steam chamber coalescence and efficient steam drive, allowing for improved steam-oil ratio and oil recovery by injecting steam into the higher pressure well to form a steam chamber and then shifting to the lower pressure well for continued steam injection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If steam is injected into both wells simultaneously at equal pressure, then steam chambers form symmetrically, but steam-to-oil ratio increases and heat is wasted heating overburden and underburden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat loss to overburden and underburdenVSAvoidsteam-to-oil ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different injection pressures to different wells based on their specific location and function. The active injection well receives higher pressure steam injection to aggressively grow the steam chamber, while the passive well receives lower or no injection. This localized differentiation optimizes heat distribution to reduce waste heating of overburden and underburden while improving steam-to-oil ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts steam injection pressures between wells based on real-time monitoring of steam chamber growth and pressure differentials. The system transitions from static equal-pressure injection to dynamic differential pressure injection, where the active well maintains higher pressure to drive steam chamber expansion while the passive well pressure is reduced to minimize heat loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Volume of moving object

If reservoir thickness is less than 15-20 meters, then well spacing is reduced, but cumulative steam oil ratio increases making the process economically unviable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereservoir thicknessVSAvoidcumulative steam oil ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter differential between wells to optimize steam chamber growth in thin reservoirs. By maintaining a pressure differential of at least 200 kPa between active and passive wells, the system achieves more efficient steam chamber coalescence and growth, reducing the cumulative steam oil ratio to economically viable levels even in reservoirs thinner than 15-20 meters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If steam is injected at high pressure, then steam chamber growth is accelerated, but pressure differential efficiency is reduced when both wells inject at equal pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam chamber growth rateVSAvoidpressure differential efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies high pressure steam injection locally to only the active injection well rather than both wells. This creates a focused pressure differential that drives rapid steam chamber growth from the active well while the passive well operates at lower pressure to receive steam efficiently without wasting energy on equal-pressure injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If conventional SAGD is used with equal pressure injection, then process is simple to operate, but steam distribution efficiency is poor and operating costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection pressure controlVSAvoidsteam distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pressure control where the system transitions from static equal-pressure operation to dynamic differential pressure operation. Pressure differentials of at least 200 kPa are maintained between active and passive wells, with the active well receiving higher pressure injection. This dynamic adjustment improves steam distribution efficiency while remaining operable through standard pressure control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the steam-oil ratio and oil recovery factor, making the process more economically viable by optimizing steam distribution and reducing cumulative steam oil ratio, thereby allowing access to thinner reservoirs.

Implementation Method 1

heat is transferred to the bitumen/heavy oil, as well as the produced fluids and overburden and underburden

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

steam is injected into the top horizontal well to heat the heavy oil/bitumen between the wellpair via conduction until mobility is established

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

applying a considerable pressure differential across the highest pressure well pair and the lowest pressure well pair

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

During gravity drainage, steam is injected into the top horizontal well and oil and condensate are produced from the lower well

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9267367B2Method for steam assisted gravity drainage with pressure differential injection
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 CONOCOPHILLIPS CO
  • US9267367B2 patent drawing
  • US9267367B2 patent drawing
  • US9267367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for recovering hydrocarbons with steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) with pressure differential injection. Methods for producing hydrocarbons in a subterranean formation having at least two well pairs include installing a highest pressure well pair in the subterranean formation; installing a lowest pressure well pair in the subterranean formation; applying a pressure differential across the highest pressure well pair and the lowest pressure well pair; injecting steam into the first injection well to form a first steam chamber; injecting steam into the final injection well to form an adjacent steam chamber; monitoring the steam chambers until they merge into a final steam chamber; ceasing the flow of steam into the first injection well; and injecting steam into the final injection well to maintain the final steam chamber.