Pressurized Solvent Extraction Flow Control for Parallel Microchannels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microreactors face challenges in scaling up production efficiently and economically due to issues with channel branching, flow instability, and high costs associated with pumps, leading to decreased extraction efficiency and contamination during the extraction process.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a raw material tank, solvent tank, pressurized gas feeding means, small diameter portions, and extraction units with mixers and liquid separating portions, which uses pressurized gas to control flow rates and minimize contamination, allowing for easier and more efficient extraction of target substances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple microreactors are arranged in parallel to increase production, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase due to multiple pumps and channel branching requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction amountVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple microreactors into a single integrated apparatus with a common feed line that branches into multiple parallel reaction channels. This merging approach allows multiple reaction units to operate simultaneously (increasing productivity) while sharing common external components like the feed pump and mixing system, thereby reducing overall device complexity and manufacturing cost compared to having separate microreactor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the reaction system into multiple parallel channels within a single microreactor apparatus. Each channel can be independently optimized for specific reactions while maintaining unified control through the common feed line. This segmentation enables increased production capacity through parallel processing without requiring completely separate apparatuses, thus balancing productivity improvement with complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If channel branching is used to distribute liquid to multiple microreactors, then productivity is improved, but flow stability deteriorates due to uneven flow distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction amountVSAvoidflow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces flow control elements (such as flow control valves or varying channel dimensions) at different locations along the parallel channels to compensate for flow distribution inequalities. By applying localized adjustments to each channel's flow characteristics, the system maintains stable flow rates in all channels while preserving the benefits of parallel processing for increased productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates flow detection and control mechanisms that monitor the flow distribution across parallel channels and automatically adjust flow control elements to maintain balanced flow rates. This feedback system ensures stable flow composition in each channel, preventing the deterioration of flow stability that would otherwise occur with simple channel branching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If pumps are used to transfer liquid raw material in microreactor systems, then flow control is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal feed line system with a single pump that serves multiple parallel microreactor channels. This multi-functional approach allows one pump to control liquid flow to several reaction units simultaneously, reducing the total number of pumps required. Consequently, the system achieves effective flow control across all channels while significantly lowering manufacturing costs compared to having dedicated pumps for each microreactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using multiple expensive pumps, the patent employs a single pump combined with flow splitting mechanisms (such as T-junctions and flow control elements) to replicate the flow control function across multiple channels. This copying approach distributes the flow control function through the fluid pathway rather than through multiple separate mechanical pumps, reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining operational effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Manufacturing precision

If extraction efficiency is increased by extending extraction time, then extraction precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidextraction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single-channel sequential extraction process to a multi-channel parallel extraction process. By distributing the liquid stream through multiple parallel microreactor channels, the system extracts target substances simultaneously across all channels, effectively adding a temporal dimension to the extraction process. This dimensional change achieves high extraction efficiency without proportionally increasing the total extraction time, as multiple extractions occur concurrently rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates easier and more efficient extraction of target substances while reducing production costs and contamination risks, enhancing the scalability and reliability of microreactor systems.

Implementation Method 1

a pressurized gas feeding means for supplying pressurized gas to the solvent tank... one end of the small diameter portion is connected to the solvent tank via a first solvent pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the mixer has a microchannel... the mixer is for mixing a liquid flowing in from the first inlet hole and a liquid flowing in from the second inlet hole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

an extraction portion for extracting the extraction target substance from the liquid raw material to the solvent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 4

a liquid separating portion connected to the extraction portion... the liquid separating portion has a first outlet hole through which a first recovered liquid containing the solvent and the extraction target substance is discharged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity gradient separation: Density Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4659831A1Cleaning device and extraction device
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 USHIO CHEMIX CORP
  • EP4659831A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4659831A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4659831A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus capable of more easily extracting an extraction target substance contained in a liquid raw material is provided. Provided is an apparatus for extracting an extraction target substance dissolved in a liquid raw material, wherein the apparatus comprises: a raw material tank, a solvent tank, a pressurized gas feeding means for feeding pressurized gas to the solvent tank, a small diameter portion; an extraction unit including a mixer, an extraction portion and separation portion, a first recovering tank and a second recovering tank.