Probabilistic Lane-Change Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in making socially accepted lane change decisions in complex urban scenarios with human-driven vehicles, particularly in dense traffic where uncertain intentions and interactions require combined prediction and planning models.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for probabilistic-based lane-change decision making and motion planning that involves receiving data on the roadway environment, performing gap analysis to filter out optimal merging entrances, and determining the probability of a neighboring driver's intention to yield, allowing the autonomous vehicle to decide whether to continue in its lane or merge based on these factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional gap analysis is used to determine merging opportunities, then the autonomous vehicle can identify potential lane change targets, but it cannot accurately predict human driver intentions in uncertain situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiduncertain driver intention
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the discrete gap analysis into a continuous probabilistic framework by introducing probability values for driver yielding intentions. This allows the system to handle uncertainty by changing from binary (gap exists/doesn't exist) to probabilistic (likelihood of yield), thereby improving prediction accuracy in uncertain situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary probabilistic model that mediates between the physical gap measurement and the driver's psychological intention. This intermediary layer (probability value) bridges the gap between observable physical states and unobservable mental states, enabling accurate prediction of human driver intentions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the system decouples prediction and planning for simplicity, then the computational model is easier to manage, but it cannot handle complex interactions in dense traffic effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoiddecision-making reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the previously decoupled prediction and planning modules into an integrated probabilistic framework. The gap analysis informs the probability calculation, which in turn guides the lane change decision, creating a unified model that handles complex interactions in dense traffic while maintaining computational tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The probabilistic framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it predicts driver intentions, evaluates merging opportunities, and guides lane change decisions. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate prediction and planning models, reducing overall system complexity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle makes conservative lane change decisions to ensure safety, then collision risk is reduced, but traffic flow efficiency and passenger comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidtraffic flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts lane change decisions based on real-time probability assessments rather than following fixed conservative rules. When the probability of driver yield is high, the system seizes merging opportunities to improve traffic flow; when probability is low, it maintains safety by avoiding unsafe merges. This dynamic approach balances safety with efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the decision parameter from binary (safe/unsafe) to probabilistic (likelihood of safety), enabling nuanced decisions that optimize both safety and efficiency. By incorporating probability thresholds and dynamic risk assessment, the system can make bolder decisions when conditions favor safety, thereby improving overall traffic flow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11608067B2Probabilistic-based lane-change decision making and motion planning system and method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11608067B2 patent drawing
  • US11608067B2 patent drawing
  • US11608067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing probabilistic-based lane-change decision making and motion planning that include receiving data associated with a roadway environment of an ego vehicle. The system and method also include performing gap analysis to determine at least one gap between neighboring vehicles that are traveling within the target lane to filter out an optimal merging entrance for the ego vehicle to merge into the target lane and determining a probability value associated with an intention of a driver of a following neighboring vehicle to yield to allow the ego vehicle to merge into the target lane. The system and method further include controlling the ego vehicle to autonomously continue traveling within the current lane or autonomously merge from current lane to the target lane based on at least one of: if the optimal merging entrance is filtered out and if the probability value indicates an intention of the driver to yield.