Processor Power State Control via Right-to-Use Status Direction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing right-to-use business model for computer resources does not effectively optimize energy consumption, as it lacks integration with processor power states, leading to inefficiencies in power usage and cooling requirements, especially for inactive or reserved processors.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a right-to-use agent (RTU) with power control utilities and utilization monitoring to dynamically adjust processor power states based on usage and contractual agreements, ensuring that reserved processors are set to low-power states when inactive, thereby reducing energy consumption and heat generation without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all processors are kept active to ensure instant availability and performance, then system responsiveness and productivity are improved, but energy consumption and cooling requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts processor power states based on real-time utilization monitoring and right-to-use status. Processors transition between active and low-power states automatically, optimizing the balance between instant availability and energy consumption without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures processors with right-to-use status and utilization thresholds before runtime. When a processor becomes available for use (status changes from reserved to available), the system proactively transitions it to an active power state in advance, ensuring instant responsiveness when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Use of energy by moving object

If processors are set to low-power states to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but activation time and system responsiveness worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidactivation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration of processor power states based on right-to-use status. When processors are reserved but available for future use, they are transitioned to intermediate power states that preserve quick activation capability while consuming less energy than fully active states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic power state transitions that adapt to changing utilization conditions. Processors can quickly transition from low-power states to active states when utilization thresholds are met, minimizing activation time while maintaining energy efficiency during idle periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If manual intervention is used to manage processor power states, then control precision is improved, but operational complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the right-to-use agent continuously monitors processor utilization and automatically adjusts power states based on predefined policies and right-to-use status. This eliminates manual intervention while maintaining precise control through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs continuous feedback loops where utilization monitoring data is fed back to the power control mechanism. This closed-loop control automatically adjusts processor power states based on real-time conditions, achieving precise control without manual intervention and reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8122264B2Power-state change as a function of direction of right-to-use status change
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8122264B2 patent drawing
  • US8122264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a computer-implemented limited right-to-use business method. In response to a command to change the right-to-use status of at least a first component, the right-to-use status of said processor is changed in a direction either from reserved to available or from available to reserved. Then, the power state of the component can be changed as a function of that direction.