Production Task Control Using Virtual-Real Environment Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In production systems, inconsistencies between target and actual production pace and quality of workpieces often occur, making it difficult to specify the cause of these inconsistencies and adapt to changes in production plans and environments, especially when autonomy is imparted through complex condition settings.

Innovation Solution

A production system with a control method that includes a local controller, a virtual local controller, a real information collection unit, and a task comparison unit to collect and compare execution records from real and virtual spaces, allowing for quick identification of inconsistent tasks and simplifying autonomy by outputting execution commands based on process progress and environment information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If complex condition settings are used to impart autonomy to production systems, then adaptability to production plan changes is improved, but system complexity and difficulty in specifying cause of inconsistencies increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to production plan changesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the production system that mirrors the real system's structure and operations. This virtual system allows for simplified analysis and debugging of autonomous behaviors without requiring complex real-world interventions. The virtual model captures essential system dynamics while enabling easier specification and tracking of causal relationships in autonomous decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the autonomous system into distinct functional components: the real production system, the virtual system model, and the comparison/analysis module. This segmentation allows each component to be developed and analyzed independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability through the virtual-real interaction framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex condition settings are used to impart autonomy to production systems, then adaptability to production plan changes is improved, but difficulty in specifying cause of inconsistencies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to production plan changesVSAvoiddifficulty in specifying cause of inconsistencies
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

By creating a virtual copy of the production system, the patent enables precise tracking and comparison of system states. The virtual model records all decisions and conditions, allowing operators to easily identify causal relationships in inconsistencies by comparing virtual predictions with actual outcomes, thus reducing the difficulty of detecting and measuring causes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the virtual system's predictions are continuously compared with the real system's actual behavior. This feedback loop automatically identifies inconsistencies and traces them back to specific conditions or decisions, making it easier to specify causes without manual analysis of complex autonomous behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional control methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but ability to adapt to changes in production plans and environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidability to adapt to changes in production plans and environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a virtual system that acts as an adaptive layer without significantly complicating the physical system. The virtual model handles the complexity of adaptation logic, while the real system maintains its relative simplicity. This copying approach enables advanced adaptability while keeping the physical control architecture straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual system serves as an intermediary between simple traditional control and complex adaptive requirements. It translates production plan changes and environmental variations into actionable adjustments for the real system, maintaining simplicity in the physical control while achieving adaptability through the virtual mediation layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230099602A1Device control based on execution command and updated environment information
Publication Date: 2023.03.30 YASKAWA DENKI KK
  • US20230099602A1 patent drawing
  • US20230099602A1 patent drawing
  • US20230099602A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A production system includes: a plurality of controllers configured to control a plurality of devices, the plurality of devices including at least one robot; and circuitry communicable with the plurality of controllers, the circuitry may be configured to: output execution commands of next tasks based on a process including a plurality of tasks for a workpiece and progress information of the process; store environment information; and update the stored environment information in accordance with operations of the plurality of devices, wherein each of the plurality of controllers is configured to control one of the plurality of devices to execute a next task corresponding to one of the execution commands based on the environment information.