Propeller Hub and Blade Intermediate Plate Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing propellers face issues such as high manufacturing costs, cavitation problems leading to turbulence and premature wear, suboptimal performance requiring powerful motors, poor adaptation with electric motors, and inefficient design causing drag and reduced thrust, especially in liquid mediums.

Innovation Solution

A propeller design featuring a hub with blades connected via intermediate plates forming specific angles, a monobloc structure made from materials like metal, plastic, or wood, with a polygonal or circular hub shape and curved blades optimized for fluid flow, allowing for efficient thrust and reduced wear, and a manufacturing process involving sheet cutting and bending.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If propellers are made with traditional multi-part construction (hub, blades, screws), then assembly flexibility is improved, but manufacturing costs increase and structural fragility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hub, blades, and connecting elements into a single monobloc structure manufactured from one piece of material. This eliminates the need for separate components and assembly operations, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining structural integrity. The single-piece construction directly addresses the contradiction by combining multiple functions into one component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If propellers operate at high rotational speeds to improve productivity, then thrust output increases, but cavitation occurs causing turbulence and premature wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust outputVSAvoidpremature wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs curved blade profiles with specific concave and convex surfaces that follow aerodynamic/hydrodynamic principles. The curved geometry optimizes fluid flow around the blades, reducing turbulence and cavitation effects at high rotational speeds. This allows the propeller to maintain high productivity while improving reliability by minimizing wear from cavitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Force

If powerful motors are used to improve thrust, then propulsion capability increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes geometric parameters of the blades including pitch angle, curvature radius, and blade area to maximize propulsion efficiency. By carefully selecting these parameters, the propeller generates sufficient thrust with reduced power requirements, thereby lowering energy consumption while maintaining the desired propulsion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If hub width is increased to improve structural strength, then connection reliability improves, but drag behind the boat increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hub structure into functional zones with varying thickness. The hub has a central region with sufficient width for structural strength and connection reliability, while the edges are tapered or reduced in width to minimize drag. This segmentation allows different parts of the hub to serve different functions optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Force

If blade pitch is increased to support motor torque, then torque capacity improves, but beyond certain pitch efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque capacityVSAvoidefficiency loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the pitch parameter within an optimal range that balances torque capacity and efficiency. The blade pitch is carefully selected to be sufficient to handle motor torque while avoiding excessive pitch values that would cause efficiency losses. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances thrust efficiency, reduces energy consumption, and extends propeller lifespan by minimizing wear and drag, while being adaptable for both forward and reverse motion and various fluid environments.

Implementation Method 1

The shape of the blades of existing propellers, which are generally arranged in relation to each other according to the screw principle, when they are intended for use in water, creates a depression on the extrados (i.e. the convex face) and an overpressure on the intrados (i.e. the concave face). The water is then ejected, thus creating thrust.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

In liquid media, most available propellers experience cavitation problems at high rotational speeds. Cavitation creates turbulence, which is far from optimal, since liquid flow is laminar under normal operating conditions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentEP2729356B1Propeller comprising a plate joining its hub and each of its blades
Publication Date: 2016.04.06 ELPHEON
  • EP2729356B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2729356B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a propeller (1) which comprises a hub (2) and a set of blades (4), characterized in that: - said hub (2) has a thickness substantially equal to that of the blades (4); - each blade (4) is connected to the hub (2) by an intermediate plate (3) which comprises a first edge (30) for connection to the hub (2) and a second edge (32) for connection to the associated blade (4), this second edge (32) having a length close or equal to that of the base (40) of the blade; - each of the plates (3) firstly forming, with one (23) of the two major faces (22, 23) of the hub (2), referred to as the "front face", the same first angle V of between 60 and 120° and, on the other hand, with each blade (4), the same second angle W of between 60 and 120°.