Propulsion Transient Response Predictor for Engine Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic engine controllers face challenges in consistently detecting engine conditions and responding to pilot commands, particularly in identifying runaway engine situations, due to significant influences from engine and ambient conditions, and are limited by small perturbation models and high computational complexity.

Innovation Solution

An electronic engine controller with an open loop transient response predictor that includes a computer processor, memory, and prediction logic to determine a predictive value for the propulsion system's closed loop response, utilizing a lookup table for altitude corrections, acceleration and deceleration transfer functions, and a selector logic to differentiate between acceleration and deceleration commands, ensuring predictions are only made within a valid operating window.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional approaches use small perturbation models to detect engine conditions, then the model complexity is reduced, but the response time increases and the model is limited to small changes in speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the response model from small perturbation assumptions to large perturbation capabilities. The transfer function model is enhanced to handle large changes in rotor speed while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized mathematical representations and pre-computed lookup tables for transient response characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-computing transient response characteristics and storing them in lookup tables during system initialization or offline processing. This allows the real-time controller to quickly query pre-computed data rather than performing complex calculations during critical response moments, reducing response time while maintaining accuracy for large perturbations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If conventional approaches use deceleration rate limits to identify runaway engine conditions, then the detection method is simple, but the results are not consistent due to engine and ambient condition influences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method complexityVSAvoiddetection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual engine response against predicted transient response characteristics. The system compares measured rotor speed changes with model predictions and uses this feedback to detect discrepancies indicating runaway conditions, adapting to varying engine and ambient conditions through real-time comparison rather than fixed thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameters from fixed deceleration rate limits to dynamic predictions based on actual engine state and ambient conditions. The transfer function model adjusts prediction parameters according to operating conditions, enabling consistent detection across varying scenarios rather than relying on static thresholds that fail to account for condition variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional approaches do not capture closed loop acceleration response characteristics, then the control logic is simpler, but the system cannot accurately determine whether the engine is accelerating or decelerating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic complexityVSAvoidacceleration response detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical threshold-based detection with a mathematical transfer function model that captures the dynamic characteristics of closed-loop acceleration response. This substitution enables precise determination of acceleration versus deceleration states by analyzing the mathematical relationship between commanded and actual rotor speed changes, providing accurate detection without complex mechanical sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If the prediction logic uses transfer functions with altitude correction terms, then the prediction accuracy across various altitudes is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing altitude correction terms and storing them in lookup tables during offline processing or system initialization. During real-time operation, the controller simply queries pre-computed correction factors based on current altitude, avoiding the need to perform complex altitude correction calculations in real-time while maintaining high prediction accuracy across various altitudes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8862363B2Closed loop propulsion system transient response predictor
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 RTX CORP
  • US8862363B2 patent drawing
  • US8862363B2 patent drawing
  • US8862363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic engine controller includes a commanded rotor speed input, an altitude input, and a current rotor speed input, a computer processor, and a memory storing a prediction logic. The prediction logic is operable to cause the processor to determine a predictive value representative of a closed loop transient response of a propulsion system's actual corrected low rotor speed in response to a commanded change in low rotor speed.