Robotic Prosthetic Limb Motor Control via BMI Neural Signal Averaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current prosthetic limb technologies are limited by the use of single algorithms, leading to delayed and inaccurate movements, and are cumbersome and dangerous due to their reliance on predictive technologies and the delicate nature of the human neurological system.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a brain machine interface (BMI) with electrodes, a processor, and a wireless transceiver, and a robotic prosthetic limb with a motor, second wireless transceiver, and controller, utilizing four deep learning algorithms to generate precise direction and speed predictions for motor control, with a biocompatible coating for safety and wireless communication for accurate and efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single algorithm is used for predictive control, then the system is simpler to implement, but the movement accuracy and speed prediction are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single algorithm into four separate deep learning algorithms, each specialized for specific predictive control tasks. This segmentation allows each algorithm to focus on particular aspects of movement prediction, thereby improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple deep learning algorithms into an integrated system where their outputs are merged to generate comprehensive motor control signals. This merging leverages the strengths of each individual algorithm to achieve superior movement accuracy and speed prediction that cannot be obtained with a single algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If predictive technologies are implemented, then the prosthetic limb can anticipate user intentions, but the system becomes cumbersome and potentially dangerous due to the delicate nature of the neurological system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthetic responsivenessVSAvoidimplantation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a wireless communication system as an intermediary between the BMI and prosthetic limb, eliminating the need for direct physical connections that could damage delicate neurological tissue. This intermediary approach maintains predictive responsiveness while significantly reducing implantation risks and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical and direct electrical connections with wireless communication technology. This substitution eliminates physical intrusion into the neurological system, reducing implantation risks while preserving the ability to transmit control signals for adaptive prosthetic operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple deep learning algorithms are used, then the direction and speed prediction improves, but the processor power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessor power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational workload across four specialized algorithms, allowing each to process specific aspects of movement prediction efficiently. This segmentation prevents any single algorithm from consuming excessive power while collectively achieving high prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-optimizing mechanisms where the multiple algorithms work together to efficiently process neural signals, reducing redundant computations and power consumption while maintaining high prediction accuracy through their coordinated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240415676A1System and method for operating a robotic prosthetic limb
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 SEPULVEDA ALEXANDRA
  • US20240415676A1 patent drawing
  • US20240415676A1 patent drawing
  • US20240415676A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for operating a robotic prosthetic limb includes a brain machine interface (BMI) configured to sense neuron activity of a user and generate a signal indicating the sensed neuron activity and a robotic prosthetic limb configured to wirelessly communicate with the BMI. The robotic prosthetic limb includes motors connected configured to actuate the robotic prosthetic limb, a processor, and a memory. The memory includes instructions which when executed by the processor cause the system to: communicate a signal from the BMI to the robotic prosthetic limb, the signal including neuron activity of the user; input the neuron activity into four machine learning models configured to generate individual predictions of a movement of the robotic prosthetic limb; generate a motor control signal, for each of the one or more motors by averaging the individual predictions; and actuate the robotic prosthetic limb in response to the generated motor control signals.