Protease Inhibitor Compounds Balancing Potency and Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for small molecular weight inhibitors that are both potent and selective for serine proteases such as Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator (HGFA), matriptase, and hepsin, as well as inhibitors for TMPRSS2 and KLK5, to treat cancer, viral infections, and other conditions related to these proteases.

Innovation Solution

Development of compounds of specific formulas that inhibit these proteases, including serine proteases and cysteine proteases, which are administered to subjects to treat or prevent conditions like cancer, viral infections, and inflammatory conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If small molecular weight inhibitors are developed for serine proteases, then potency and selectivity are improved, but achieving both high potency and high selectivity simultaneously is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidpotency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing inhibitors with specific molecular features at particular positions to achieve selective binding to target proteases. The compounds contain specific functional groups and structural elements (such as heterocyclic rings, peptide-like moieties, and hydrophobic regions) that interact with specific residues in the protease active site, enabling discrimination between similar protease families while maintaining high affinity for the target enzyme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying molecular parameters of the inhibitor compounds, including molecular weight, hydrophobicity, charge distribution, and structural flexibility. By optimizing these parameters within specific ranges, the invention achieves the balance between potency (requiring high affinity) and selectivity (requiring specific recognition patterns) for the target serine and cysteine proteases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If protease inhibitors are administered to treat cancer and viral infections, then therapeutic efficacy is improved, but potential toxicities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtoxicities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces systemic toxicity by designing inhibitors with local quality features that enable selective accumulation at disease sites. The compounds incorporate structural elements that favor binding to overexpressed proteases in cancer cells or infected cells, while sparing normal tissues with lower protease expression. This selective targeting minimizes off-target effects and systemic toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of protease inhibition into a beneficial therapeutic effect by exploiting the overexpression of specific proteases in diseased states. The inhibitors target proteases that are abnormally elevated in cancer cells or virus-infected cells, transforming what could be a non-specific toxic effect into a selective therapeutic action against the diseased tissue while preserving normal physiological functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Adaptability or versatility

If protease inhibitors are developed for multiple protease targets, then versatility in treating different conditions is improved, but selectivity for individual targets becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a series of related compounds with a common core structure that can inhibit multiple protease targets within the same family (serine or cysteine proteases). The inhibitors share a peptidomimetic scaffold that recognizes conserved features across family members, enabling broad-spectrum activity against related enzymes while maintaining sufficient selectivity within the therapeutic window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent resolves the selectivity-versatility conflict by incorporating local quality variations in the inhibitor structures. Each compound in the series contains specific substituents or functional groups at defined positions that fine-tune the binding affinity and selectivity for particular protease targets. This allows the same core scaffold to target multiple enzymes while maintaining discriminative capability through localized structural modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12590123B2Compounds and methods for treating cancer, viral infections, and allergic conditions
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 WASHINGTON UNIV IN SAINT LOUIS
  • US12590123B2 patent drawing
  • US12590123B2 patent drawing
  • US12590123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to compounds that are useful for inhibiting one or more trypsin-like S1 serine proteases, HGFA, matriptase, hepsin, KLK5 and/or TMPRSS2 as well as cysteine proteases including trypsin-like cysteine proteases (e.g. Cathepsin B). The present invention also relates to various methods of using the inhibitor compounds to treat or prevent viral infections, including those caused by coronaviruses and influenza, conditions associated with KLK5, various malignancies, pre-malignant conditions, and cancer.