Pull-Type Double Diaphragm Spring Brake Actuator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spring brake actuators for vehicles require a robust structure to withstand vibrations and forces, leading to increased material usage, cost, and space requirements due to their push-type design, which suspends a large mass far from the brake caliper mounting flange.

Innovation Solution

A pull-type double diaphragm spring brake actuator is designed with the center of mass closer to the mounting flange, using a power spring adjacent to the flange, allowing for lighter components and reduced structural demands, enabling a more compact and cost-effective design that can be integrated with existing brake systems without significant modifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a push-type spring brake actuator design is used, then the brake can be applied with sufficient force, but the center of mass is positioned far from the mounting flange requiring robust structure with increased material usage and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake application forceVSAvoidactuator structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional push-type actuator design by using a pull-type mechanism. The power spring is positioned adjacent to the mounting flange and pulls on the parking brake piston through a connecting rod, rather than pushing from the opposite end. This inversion relocates the center of mass closer to the mounting flange, reducing the moment arm and allowing for lighter structural components while maintaining sufficient brake application force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Force

If the center of mass is positioned far from the mounting flange, then the brake application force is sufficient, but the structural demands increase leading to more material usage and space requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake application forceVSAvoidactuator mounting area
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the actuator design to pull-type configuration, the center of mass is relocated closer to the mounting flange. This reduces the moment arm distance, thereby reducing the structural area and material needed to withstand vibrations and forces, while still achieving sufficient brake application force through the power spring mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If a robust structure is used to withstand vibrations and forces, then the actuator reliability is improved, but the manufacturing cost and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inverted pull-type design positions the power spring and center of mass closer to the mounting flange, which reduces the moment arm and the forces transmitted to the structural components. This allows for lighter, less costly materials and simpler manufacturing while maintaining adequate reliability to withstand vibrations and operational forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Device complexity

If the power spring is positioned away from the mounting flange, then the brake application mechanism is simpler, but the center of mass positioning creates larger moments requiring robust structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake application mechanism complexityVSAvoidactuator structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of positioning the power spring away from the mounting flange, the invention inverts the design to place the power spring adjacent to the mounting flange. This inversion reduces the moment arm and structural weight requirements, while the complexity of the brake application mechanism is managed through the connecting rod that transmits the pull force from the spring to the parking brake piston.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The pull-type actuator achieves a greater than 10% reduction in weight, 25% improvement in center of mass positioning, and a substantial reduction in parts and manufacturing costs, while maintaining effective brake functionality.

Implementation Method 1

a power spring positioned adjacent to the mounting flange and configured to move the parking brake piston in the brake application direction when the parking brake is applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A service brake diaphragm is provided in the service brake chamber and is arranged to move the service brake piston in a brake application direction when the service brake is applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

A parking brake release diaphragm is provided in the parking brake chamber and is arranged to move the parking brake piston in the brake release direction when the parking brake is released

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS9701294B2Pull style double diaphragm spring brake actuator
Publication Date: 2017.07.11 BENDIX SPICER FOUNDATION BRAKE LLC
  • US9701294B2 patent drawing
  • US9701294B2 patent drawing
  • US9701294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spring-type brake actuator for a vehicle brake such as a pneumatically-actuated brake is provided, in which the actuator's operating rod is pulled toward the actuator to apply the brake. The actuator's parking brake release piston is located closer to the brake than the service brake piston, and the parking brake power spring is positioned between the mounting end of the actuator and the parking brake piston such that when parking brake release pressure is removed from the parking brake release chamber the parking brake piston biases the operating rod in the brake application direction, drawing the operating rod further into the actuator. The operating rod may penetrate the parking brake piston and an intermediate flange between the parking brake piston and the service brake piston, and be connected to the service brake piston such that the service brake piston may control brake application when the parking brake piston is in its parking brake release position adjacent to the end of the actuator that is mounted to the brake.