Pyrotechnic Connector Locking Spring Ejection Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pyrotechnic connectors in safety restraint systems of motor vehicles face challenges in ensuring correct connection and preventing bad connections due to vibrations and shocks, leading to potential deformation of spring-based locking systems and failure to maintain a secure lock.

Innovation Solution

An electrical connector design featuring a main housing with a locking spring and a connector position assurance member that opposes incorrect mating, automatically ejecting the connector if not correctly inserted and maintaining a secure lock when correctly coupled, utilizing a formed wire spring and CPA device to ensure proper alignment and locking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spring-based locking system is used to maintain connector connection, then the connector can be securely locked, but the spring deforms with each connection/disconnection cycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector locking reliabilityVSAvoidspring structural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the spring from the repeated connection/disconnection cycle by positioning it only in the retained state housing, rather than requiring it to function during insertion and removal. The spring is engaged only when the connector is properly retained, eliminating deformation from cyclic loading while maintaining secure locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The connector is designed with preliminary positioning features (guide pins, alignment surfaces) that ensure correct engagement before the spring-based locking mechanism activates. This preliminary action prevents misalignment and excessive force on the spring during connection, reducing deformation risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a secondary locking system is added to prevent bad connections, then connection reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidconnector structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the secondary locking function with the retention mechanism itself. The retention arms and spring system that provide secure locking also serve as the secondary locking mechanism, eliminating the need for separate locking components and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-based retention system performs multiple functions: it provides secure locking, acts as a secondary locking mechanism, and enables automatic release when misaligned. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, simplifying the overall connector structure while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the connector design is standardized to meet automotive specifications, then manufacturing efficiency improves, but adaptability to different configurations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidconnector configuration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is divided into standardized modular components (housing, retention arms, spring assembly, electrical contacts) that can be manufactured separately using standardized processes. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for mass production while the assembled connector can be configured for different applications, balancing manufacturing efficiency with adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures automatic prevention of bad connections and maintains a secure lock by using a formed wire spring and CPA device to prevent incorrect insertion and ensure correct alignment, enhancing the reliability and safety of pyrotechnic connectors in automotive applications.

Implementation Method 1

a locking spring (1221), provided in the main housing (1201) and relaxed in a delivered state of the connector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the spring tension opposes mating as long as the connector and the mating connector are not correctly mated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring tension: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2876745B1Electrical connector for safety restraint system
Publication Date: 2017.08.23 TYCO ELECTRONICS FRANCE
  • EP2876745B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2876745B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2876745B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an electrical connector (2200), in particular a pyrotechnic connector, which can be coupled with a conjugate connector (100) in a coupling direction (300), comprising: a main housing (2201); a locking spring (2221) relaxed in a delivery state; a connector position assurance element (2235) movable so as to cause a tension in the spring (2221) opposing coupling until the connector (2200) and the conjugate connector (100) are properly coupled; and at least one main locking element (2217, 2218) which can be deflected during coupling and whose delivery position allows the connector (2200) to be locked to the conjugate connector (100) when they are properly coupled.The connector position assurance element (2235) is further configured to prevent deflection of said at least one main locking element (2217, 2218) in the delivery state.