Quasi-Virtual Locate/Drill/Shim Process for Aircraft Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for locating and shimming parts in large structures like aircraft or ships face challenges such as inherent reference tolerance, infeasibility of determinate assembly holes in complex structures, and inefficiencies in manually adjustable drill jigs that do not account for surface variations, leading to errors and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A quasi-virtual locate/drill/shim process using metrology-directed DA hole placement with 3-D CAD tools and predictive shimming, employing adjustable drill bushings driven by 3-D measurement data and optical targets for accurate positioning and shim gap calculation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If determinate assembly holes are used for aligning parts, then parts can be held together with temporary fasteners, but inherent reference tolerance and tolerance build-up occur especially in large parts or assemblies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of part alignmentVSAvoidhole placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical drill jigs with a laser scanner-based measurement system. The laser scanner captures 3D coordinates of surface points, and a computer calculates precise hole locations based on these measurements, eliminating the mechanical tolerance accumulation inherent in physical jigs and fixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the part surface by scanning it with a laser scanner. This digital model is then used to calculate hole locations without requiring physical contact or mechanical fixtures, thereby avoiding the tolerance build-up that occurs in physical determination assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If monument locating jigs are used to hold parts in place, then parts can be positioned accurately, but the jigs are expensive to build and maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart positioning accuracyVSAvoidcost and complexity of locating equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive mechanical monument locating jigs with a laser scanner and computer-based system. The laser scanner non-contactively measures surface geometry, and software algorithms calculate the precise positioning of components, eliminating the need for costly physical fixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The part itself serves as the reference for positioning through its scanned surface geometry. The laser scanner captures the actual surface features, and the computer uses these measurements to determine hole locations directly from the part's own geometry, eliminating the need for external positioning fixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If manually adjustable drill jigs are used, then flexibility in positioning is achieved, but real-time positioning feedback is required and surface variation is not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in hole placementVSAvoidhole location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual adjustment mechanisms with an automated laser scanning and computer calculation system. The laser scanner captures surface variation, and the computer automatically calculates corrected hole locations that account for the actual surface geometry, eliminating the need for manual positioning and feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary measurement of the surface geometry using a laser scanner before hole placement. This advance knowledge of surface variation allows the computer to calculate precise hole locations that compensate for manufacturing tolerances and surface irregularities before the drilling operation begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If DA holes are placed ahead of time on built-up structures, then assembly is simplified, but the correct location is not yet known for complex structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoidhole location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary scanning and calculation to determine the correct hole locations before drilling. The laser scanner captures the actual surface geometry, and the computer calculates precise hole positions based on these measurements, allowing holes to be placed accurately without requiring pre-positioned fixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical trial-and-error positioning with a laser-based measurement and computer-based calculation system. This allows hole locations to be determined accurately and efficiently without requiring physical fixtures or iterative adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9435633B2Quasi-virtual locate/drill/shim process
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US9435633B2 patent drawing
  • US9435633B2 patent drawing
  • US9435633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining characteristics of a shim fittable between first and second bodies, comprising: (a) placing optical targets in respective sets of holes in the first and second bodies; (b) scanning respective surfaces of the first and second bodies using a three-dimensional scanner to acquire point cloud scan data, measured hole vector data and other discrete feature data; (c) processing the point cloud scan data, measured hole vector data and other discrete feature data to derive first deviation values representing the deviation of the surface of the first body from a nominal surface of the first body and second deviation values representing the deviation of the surface of the second body from a nominal surface of the second body; (d) correlating the first deviation values with the second deviation values based on a best fit position of the first body relative to the second body; and (e) computing shim gap values based on the correlated first and second deviation values.