Radar Calibration Environment Suitability via Eigenvalue Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radar device calibration systems face challenges in accurately aligning the receiving antenna's reference axis with the vehicle's mounting reference axis due to environmental obstacles, which hinder correct detection of the reflector and axis alignment in real-world settings outside controlled factory environments.

Innovation Solution

A radar device equipped with a signal processing unit that calculates eigenvalue ratios from received radar wave signals to assess the suitability of the installation environment for calibration, using eigenvalue decomposition and ratio calculations to differentiate between signal power and thermal noise, thereby determining if the environment is suitable for calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If calibration is performed in a real-world environment with obstacles, then the radar device can be calibrated in practical installation settings, but environmental obstacles reflect radar waves and cause incorrect detection of the reflector location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration environment adaptabilityVSAvoidreflector location detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the calibration environment before executing the calibration process. The control unit detects the number of eigenvalues from the correlation matrix in advance, and only proceeds with calibration when the environment is determined to be suitable (single eigenvalue case), thereby preventing incorrect detection caused by obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses eigenvalue decomposition of the correlation matrix to provide feedback about the calibration environment quality. By analyzing the number of eigenvalues, the system receives feedback on whether environmental obstacles are present, and adjusts the calibration execution accordingly - proceeding only when feedback indicates a suitable environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the number of arrival radar waves is estimated using conventional eigenvalue decomposition, then the arrival azimuth can be detected, but the method cannot distinguish between single and multiple eigenvalue cases in complex environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrival azimuth detection accuracyVSAvoidenvironment assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Before detecting arrival azimuth, the system performs preliminary eigenvalue decomposition to assess the calibration environment. By detecting the number of eigenvalues in advance, the system determines whether the environment is suitable for accurate azimuth detection, preventing incorrect measurements in complex environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediate assessment step using eigenvalue analysis between the radar signal reception and arrival azimuth detection. This intermediary process evaluates environment suitability and gates the subsequent azimuth detection, ensuring accuracy while managing complexity through a structured two-stage approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If calibration reflector is installed at predetermined position, then axis alignment can be calibrated, but environmental obstacles in addition to reflector cause incorrect detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxis alignment precisionVSAvoidcalibration obstacle interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs preliminary detection of the calibration environment by analyzing eigenvalues before executing axis alignment calibration. This preliminary action identifies whether obstacles are present that would interfere with reflector detection, and prevents calibration execution when harmful factors are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potentially harmful effect of environmental obstacles into a useful diagnostic tool. By using eigenvalue decomposition to detect obstacle presence, the system transforms what would be interfering factors into informative indicators that guide the calibration process, ensuring precision by avoiding calibration when obstacles are present

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate detection of axis alignment and environment suitability, improving calibration accuracy by distinguishing between single and multiple eigenvalue ratios, thus ensuring correct alignment of the receiving antenna's axis with the vehicle's mounting reference axis.

Implementation Method 1

The receiving antenna receives arrival radar waves (or reflected radar waves) which are reflected by objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The method executes eigenvalue-decomposition of the generated correlation matrix in order to estimate the number of the arrival radar waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEigenvalue decomposition:

Data Source

PatentUS8816900B2Radar device, calibration system and calibration method
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 DENSO CORP
  • US8816900B2 patent drawing
  • US8816900B2 patent drawing
  • US8816900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an environment inspection mode of a calibration system, a radar device executes a signal analysis process to calculate an eigenvalue ratio of each comparison eigenvalue. The eigenvalue ratio has a small value when a pair of eigenvalues corresponding to arrival radar waves has a strong correlation. On the other hand, the eigenvalue ratio has a large value when the eigenvalue ratio is calculated between an eigenvalue and thermal noise. When there is no eigenvalue which is not more than a reference threshold value, the radar device indicates a notice that the current environment is suitable for the calibration of the radar device. On the other hand, when there is presence of at least one eigenvalue of not more than the reference threshold value, the radar device indicates a notice that the current environment is unsuitable for the calibration of the radar device.