Radar Presence Detection with Electronic Range Gating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar-based presence detection systems, particularly Doppler and FMCW radars, face challenges in efficiently and cost-effectively detecting multiple moving objects within a detection area without disturbing ongoing traffic and are difficult to reconfigure due to mechanical adjustments and high hardware costs.

Innovation Solution

A method using a Doppler or FMCW radar that dynamically adjusts the detection range based on object speed, allowing electronic reconfiguration and reducing angle dependency, enabling precise detection and speed measurement even with multiple vehicles, using a speed sensor and control unit to estimate object entry and position within a predetermined area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical adjustment is used to reconfigure the detection area, then the detection range can be adjusted to a specific distance range, but access to the sensor is required which disturbs ongoing traffic and is difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection range configurationVSAvoidsensor accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical adjustment mechanisms with electronic control of the radar sensor. The detection range is configured through software parameters (gate start and gate length) rather than physical adjustment, eliminating the need for technician access to the sensor during traffic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the detection range by modifying electronic parameters (gate position and gate length) rather than physical configuration. This allows flexible adjustment of the detection area through software without requiring mechanical intervention or access to the sensor hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If FMCW radar is used for distance and speed measurement, then both parameters can be measured, but the hardware costs increase due to required tunable signal sources and complex signal processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance and speed measurementVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary measurement capability from FMCW radar by using a simplified approach: measuring distance at a single gate position. This eliminates the need for complex tunable signal sources and sophisticated signal processing while maintaining adequate distance measurement functionality for traffic applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a simpler, more cost-effective radar implementation that sacrifices some measurement sophistication for reduced hardware complexity and cost. The system uses fixed-frequency or simple FMCW radar with limited range gating rather than full-featured tunable FMCW systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If FMCW radar superimposes distance and speed signals, then both measurements can be obtained simultaneously, but complex signal processing is required to separate the signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous measurement capabilityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential measurement data by focusing on distance measurement at a specific gate position rather than attempting to fully separate and process both distance and speed signals. This selective approach eliminates complex signal processing requirements while maintaining productivity for traffic detection applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If simplified FMCW radar is used with alternate speed and distance measurement, then hardware costs are reduced, but the method only works with one vehicle in the detection area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware simplicityVSAvoidmulti-vehicle detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection area into multiple range gates, allowing simultaneous measurement of multiple vehicles at different distances. By dividing the detection range into discrete segments (gates), the system can track multiple objects independently while using simplified hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a simple, robust, and cost-effective solution for presence detection and speed measurement, allowing for dynamic adjustment of the detection area and reducing hardware costs, while maintaining precision and accuracy even at high speeds and with multiple vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

radar sensors are used for presence detection, particularly in applications in traffic engineering for detecting vehicle presence, distance and speed... only a change in the reflection phase of the reflecting object or scenario can be detected in addition to the reflection amplitude. Consequently, only the movement or speed of an object can be measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2041602B1Method and device for the detection of at least one moving object.
Publication Date: 2013.02.06 SIEMENS AG
  • EP2041602B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2041602B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to method for the detection of at least one moving object (1) in a pre-determined detection range (ZD) by means of a speed sensor (2), comprising the following steps: determining a detection range (ZD) within an illumination region (ZL) of the speed sensor (2); detecting a speed signal, particularly a Doppler signal, at least with the entry of a moving object (1) into the illumination region (ZL); estimating an entry of the moving object (1) into the detection range (ZD) on the basis of a speed (V; Vr) of the object (1), and of a distance (d) between a boundary (dl; d4) of the illumination region (ZL) and the detection range (ZD).