Railway Braking Force Distribution for Friction Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing railway braking systems fail to optimally distribute braking forces between dynamic and friction braking means, leading to unsatisfactory reduction in wear of friction materials, particularly in high-speed rail vehicles, resulting in high maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A railway vehicle braking system that automatically prioritizes dynamic braking over friction braking by using a central unit to calculate and distribute braking forces based on parameters such as dynamic and friction braking capacities, wheel-rail adhesion, and bogie mass, ensuring that friction braking is minimized and only activated when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If friction braking means are used to provide braking force, then braking capability is ensured, but wear of friction materials increases leading to high maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidwear of friction materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the distribution parameter of braking force between dynamic and friction braking based on real-time conditions. The control unit continuously adjusts the proportion of braking force provided by each system, optimizing the balance between braking performance and friction material preservation, thereby reducing wear while ensuring adequate braking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes mechanical friction braking with electrodynamic braking (using traction motors in generator mode) to the maximum extent possible. By prioritizing dynamic braking which has no wear, the system replaces the wear-prone mechanical friction system with a wear-free electromagnetic system, significantly reducing friction material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of substance

If dynamic braking means are prioritized to reduce friction material wear, then maintenance costs decrease, but braking capability may be insufficient under certain conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear of friction materialsVSAvoidbraking capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The braking force distribution is made dynamic rather than static. The control unit continuously monitors vehicle speed, braking demand, and system capabilities, adjusting in real-time the proportion of dynamic versus friction braking. This dynamic adaptation ensures optimal braking performance across all operating conditions while maximizing the use of wear-free dynamic braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system is segmented into two independent but coordinated subsystems: dynamic braking (traction motors) and friction braking (brake discs and pads). Each subsystem operates within its optimal range, with the control unit distributing braking demand between them. This segmentation allows each subsystem to function where it is most effective, ensuring overall braking reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of substance

If braking force is distributed between dynamic and friction braking means, then friction material wear is reduced, but the distribution is not optimal leading to unsatisfactory wear reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear of friction materialsVSAvoidwear reduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control where the control unit continuously monitors actual braking performance, vehicle deceleration, and system status. Based on this feedback, the control unit dynamically adjusts the braking force distribution between dynamic and friction braking, optimizing wear reduction efficiency in real-time rather than using fixed predetermined distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit proactively manages braking force distribution before friction materials reach critical wear levels. By continuously optimizing the braking mix in advance and adjusting proactively based on predicted braking demands and system capabilities, the system maximizes wear reduction efficiency rather than reacting passively to wear accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach extends the life of friction materials, reduces maintenance costs, and optimizes the use of braking forces, thereby minimizing wear and improving operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The dynamic braking means are generally formed by traction means of the railway vehicle, the dynamic braking consisting of a reduction in speed thanks to these traction means.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

These braking means comprise brake discs integral with the axles, and brake linings, the linings being provided with friction materials. Braking by friction is achieved by clamping each friction disc between two corresponding friction linings.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3656620B1Railway vehicle comprising an improved braking system
Publication Date: 2022.01.26 SPEEDINNOV
  • EP3656620B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The braking system (10) includes: means (20) for calculating an overall braking force required to meet an overall braking instruction, based on parameters of the railway vehicle; means (22) for calculating a dynamic braking force establishing whether dynamic braking is sufficient to ensure the entire overall braking, and for giving a dynamic braking force instruction equal to a maximum dynamic braking capacity, within the limit of the overall braking instruction; and means (24) for calculating friction braking, giving a friction braking force instruction of zero if dynamic braking is sufficient to ensure the entire overall braking, and for giving a friction braking force instruction corresponding to the difference between the overall braking force instruction and the dynamic braking force otherwise.