RC Extraction Using Location-Based Thickness Adjustments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RC extraction methods are inaccurate due to significant variations in feature dimensions caused by manufacturing processes like CMP and etch, leading to incorrect analysis results when using as-designed dimensions instead of as-manufactured dimensions.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses location-based prediction data to perform net-specific top and bottom adjustments for thickness predictions, considering both CMP and etch manufacturing processes, and integrates this data into RC extraction tools for accurate analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If RC extraction is performed using as-designed dimensions, then the analysis process is simple and fast, but the analysis results are incorrect due to manufacturing variations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRC extraction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing manufacturing process simulations (CMP, etch, lithography) before RC extraction to predict as-manufactured dimensions. This allows the RC analysis to use accurate predicted dimensions rather than ideal design dimensions, improving measurement precision while managing complexity through automated simulation workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of manufacturing simulation tools that translate design dimensions into predicted as-manufactured dimensions. This intermediary process accounts for manufacturing variations and provides corrected geometric data to the RC extraction tool, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple manufacturing processes are considered in RC extraction, then the analysis accuracy improves, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness prediction accuracyVSAvoidRC extraction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the manufacturing process into distinct simulation modules (CMP simulation, etch simulation, lithography simulation) that can be executed independently. Each process contributes specific variation parameters that are combined to produce the final as-manufactured dimensions, allowing for optimized computation and parallel processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from using fixed design dimensions to using dynamic predicted dimensions that incorporate manufacturing variations. By parameterizing the dimension predictions based on process variations (dishing, erosion, metal losses), the system achieves higher accuracy while managing computational complexity through parameter-based models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8312406B2Method and system performing RC extraction
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 CADENCE DESIGN SYST INC
  • US8312406B2 patent drawing
  • US8312406B2 patent drawing
  • US8312406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer program product are disclosed for performing RC extraction. The present approach can consider multiple types of manufacturing processes, and allows location-based prediction data to be used in the context of net-based analysis. RC extraction can be more accurately performed based upon net-specific top and bottom adjustments to thickness prediction that are location-based. The net-based prediction data can be used for other purposes as well, such as to perform electrical hotspot analysis, to visually display physical properties of the nets, or allow queries for other data analysis purposes.