Reachability Control for Safe Autonomous State Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As autonomous systems become more complex and operate in unpredictable environments, it becomes increasingly difficult to ensure correct operation and safety, as current certification methods require analyzing all possible states, which is infeasible in complex scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a reachability controller that analyzes the current state and control signals to determine if a transition to a new state will result in a safe state, and if additional safe states can be reached from that new state, thereby blocking unsafe transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all possible states are analyzed to ensure system safety, then system reliability is improved, but device complexity and testing requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reachability controller performs preliminary analysis of potential future states before the autonomous system actually transitions to them. By computing reachable sets and analyzing safety properties in advance, the system identifies unsafe states and prevents transitions to them, ensuring safety without requiring exhaustive testing of all possible states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reachability controller acts as an intermediary between the controller and the autonomous system. It receives control signals, analyzes their safety implications by computing reachable sets, and only allows safe transitions to proceed. This intermediary layer ensures safety without requiring the main controller to perform exhaustive state analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If exhaustive state analysis is performed to certify autonomous systems, then system reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to extensive testing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem certificationVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Safety analysis is performed preliminarily and continuously during operation rather than through exhaustive post-deployment testing. The reachability controller computes reachable sets and verifies safety properties in real-time, allowing the system to be certified through operational analysis rather than extensive pre-testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback through the reachability controller, which monitors control signals, analyzes their safety implications, and provides immediate feedback on whether transitions are safe. This continuous verification replaces the need for extensive external testing and accelerates the certification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system allows all possible state transitions to maintain flexibility, then adaptability is improved, but system safety deteriorates due to increased risk of unsafe states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate transition flexibilityVSAvoidsystem safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reachability controller serves as an intermediary that receives control signals from the controller, analyzes their safety implications by computing reachable sets, and selectively permits or blocks transitions. This maintains the controller's flexibility in choosing actions while ensuring that only safe transitions are executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the parameter of state transition permission based on reachability analysis results. When reachable sets indicate safe transitions, the system allows full flexibility; when unsafe states are detected, transitions are blocked. This dynamic parameter adjustment maintains adaptability while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12252154B2Automated system including reachability analysis
Publication Date: 2025.03.18 SIEMENS AG
  • US12252154B2 patent drawing
  • US12252154B2 patent drawing
  • US12252154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous system includes a vehicle operable to travel from a first point to a second point, a first actuator operable to adjust a speed of the vehicle, and a second actuator operable to adjust a direction of travel of the vehicle. A controller is operable to send control signals to the first actuator and the second actuator to facilitate the transition of the system from a first state to a second state during travel between the first point and the second point. A reachability controller is coupled to the controller to receive the first state and the control signals and to analyze the first state and the control signals to determine if the second state is a safe state.