Rear Wheel Suspension Link Angles for Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wheel suspensions for motor vehicles face challenges in achieving maximized traction and homogeneous contact pressure between the tire and road, especially during critical driving conditions, and struggle to synchronize suspension motions to maintain driver control under varying loads and accelerations.

Innovation Solution

The wheel suspension design features a virtual lower triangular link and upper triangular link configuration with specific angles and slopes, an instantaneous center of motion positioned outside or inside the wheel spindle, and interdependent control links that synchronize motion to ensure homogeneous contact pressure and traction, adapting to different driving conditions and cornering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional wheel suspension designs are used, then the basic suspension function is provided, but traction power and homogeneous contact pressure between tire and road are not maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction powerVSAvoidsuspension link configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension device is divided into multiple control links (lower control link, upper control link, trailing link, toe link) that independently control different aspects of wheel motion. Each link is responsible for specific degrees of freedom, allowing precise control of contact pressure distribution and traction forces without requiring a completely redesigned suspension architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a specific geometric configuration where the lower and upper control links form a triangular arrangement with defined angles (1-8°) in the longitudinal-vertical plane. This spatial arrangement creates an instantaneous center of motion positioned outside the wheel spindle, adding a dimensional aspect to the control mechanism that enables homogeneous contact pressure while maintaining traction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the suspension is designed for maximized traction with specific link angles, then homogeneous contact pressure is achieved, but the suspension must adapt to varying driving conditions and loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehomogeneous contact pressureVSAvoidadaptation to driving conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control links are designed with specific angular relationships (1-8° between lower and upper links) that create a dynamic instantaneous center of motion. As the wheel moves through different positions during suspension travel, the instantaneous center shifts position, automatically adapting the force distribution to maintain homogeneous contact pressure across varying loading conditions and driving scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise angular parameters for the control links (1-8° angle between lower and upper links, specific slopes downward and rearward) that optimize the instantaneous center position. These parameter settings enable the suspension to maintain consistent contact pressure distribution across different driving conditions, loads, and wheel positions without requiring active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple control links are added to synchronize motion patterns, then driver control is maintained under varying loads, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver control under varying loadsVSAvoidcontrol links configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lower control link and upper control link are merged into a triangular configuration that shares common mounting points and coordination mechanisms. This merging allows the links to work together as an integrated unit, synchronizing wheel motion control while reducing the need for separate independent control systems for each link.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control links are designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: the lower and upper links together control camber, caster, and wheel alignment while maintaining the instantaneous center position. The trailing link and toe link provide additional control over steering geometry and wheel orientation, making the overall linkage system multi-functional without requiring entirely separate control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2651664B1A wheel suspension, and a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 SWEDISH ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS
  • EP2651664B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2651664B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2651664B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A motor vehicle has a wheel suspension for the rear wheel. The wheel suspension comprises wheel spindle housing (11) and a frame structure (9). Several control links extend between the frame structure (9) and the wheel spindle housing (11), and comprise a lower rear link (13), trailing and toe links (16, 17), and first and second camber links (18, 19), which intersect each other. The trailing link (16) and the lower rear link (13) form a lower triangular link swingable about a lower swing axis. The first camber link (18) and the second camber link (19) together form an upper triangular link swingable about an upper swing axis. The lower and upper swing axes form a first angle to each other in a horizontal plane lying in the interval 0-5°. The lower and upper swing axes form a second angle to each other in a vertical, longitudinal plane lying in the interval 1-8°.