Deformed Rebar Bending With Multi-Angle Springback Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting springback in deformed reinforcing bars, which have non-uniform cross-sections, are inaccurate due to variations in bending behavior based on mounting mode, bending position, and other factors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a reinforcing bar bending device that measures the springback amount by rotating the effort member to predetermined and subsequent bending angles, allowing for the prediction of the springback relationship based on these measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing springback prediction methods are used for deformed reinforcing bars, then the prediction process is simple, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to non-uniform cross-section and mounting variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespringback prediction accuracyVSAvoidbending measurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing multiple bending angle measurements at different bending angles (first bending angle measurement step and second bending angle measurement step) before final springback calculation. This preliminary multi-angle measurement process captures the non-linear bending behavior of deformed reinforcing bars, enabling accurate springback prediction while accounting for mounting variations and cross-section non-uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the measured bending angles from multiple measurement steps to calculate and adjust the springback amount. The calculated springback amount is then fed back to determine the appropriate bending angle for actual bending operations, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves prediction accuracy based on measured results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If bending is performed without accurate springback prediction, then the process is faster, but the bending precision deteriorates and fails to achieve target angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending angle precisionVSAvoidspringback measurement and calculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary springback characterization by conducting bending angle measurements at multiple predetermined bending angles before actual production bending. This preliminary data collection establishes the relationship between bending angle and springback amount, enabling accurate target angle calculation for subsequent bending operations without requiring real-time iterative adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of bending angle to multiple predetermined values (first bending angle and second bending angle that is greater than the first) during measurement. By measuring springback at different bending angle parameters, the method captures the non-linear behavior of deformed reinforcing bars and establishes an accurate springback model for predicting target angles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If springback is not considered in bending, then the operation is simpler, but the resulting shape deviates from the target configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebent bar configuration accuracyVSAvoidbending process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by calculating the springback amount in advance and compensating for it in the target bending angle determination. The system measures bending angles at multiple steps, calculates the springback amount based on these measurements, and then determines a corrected target bending angle that accounts for the expected springback, thereby achieving accurate final configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical trial-and-error bending adjustments with a calculation-based springback prediction system. By using measured bending angle data from multiple measurement steps to calculate springback amount and determine target angles, the method substitutes iterative mechanical adjustments with a deterministic calculation approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables accurate prediction of springback in deformed reinforcing bars, reducing errors and allowing for precise bending to target angles.

Implementation Method 1

springback occurs during bending of a metal member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12276641B2Method for predicting springback amount and method for bending deformed reinforcing bar
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 TOYO KENSETABU KOKI
  • US12276641B2 patent drawing
  • US12276641B2 patent drawing
  • US12276641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided a method for predicting a springback amount and a method for bending a deformed reinforcing bar including: supplying the deformed reinforcing bar bending the supplied deformed reinforcing bar, and subsequently measuring a first bending angle in a state of releasing a bending force on the deformed reinforcing bar; further bending the reinforcing bar from which the bending force has been released, and subsequently measuring a second bending angle in a state of releasing the bending force; and predicting a relationship between the bending angle and the springback amount by using the measurement results after executing the further bending once or a plurality of times, in which the bending angle is greater for subsequent steps.