Recycling Bin Liner Retention and Stacking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recycling bins are difficult to use due to various deficiencies, such as poor retention of liners and inefficient stacking and nesting mechanisms, which complicate the handling and storage of recyclable materials.

Innovation Solution

A residential recycling bin design featuring angled sidewalls and a rotatable handle that securely retains liners using inverted 'V'-shaped retainers and facilitates easy stacking and nesting through specific angle configurations, preventing movement between stacked bins and ensuring smooth surface interaction for liner retention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional recycling bins are used, then basic storage function is provided, but liner retention is poor and bins are difficult to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner retentionVSAvoiddifficulty to use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The bin is divided into functional segments: the bin body, the liner, and the inverted V-shaped retainer. The retainer is a separate component that can be installed independently to provide liner retention without modifying the entire bin structure. This segmentation allows the retention function to be added or removed independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inverted V-shaped retainer acts as an intermediary element between the bin wall and the liner. Instead of directly attaching the liner to the bin or using complex retention mechanisms, the retainer serves as a simple intermediate structure that intercepts and holds the liner in place through its geometric shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If stacking mechanisms are added to bins, then space efficiency is improved, but stacking and nesting become inefficient and complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidstacking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bin design enables nesting capability where smaller bins can be placed inside larger bins. The inverted V-shaped retainers on opposite walls create a geometric configuration that allows bins to nest efficiently without requiring complex interlocking mechanisms. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization while maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The bin utilizes specific angle configurations of the inverted V-shaped retainers to achieve efficient stacking and nesting. By optimizing the geometric parameters (angles and dimensions) of the retainer structure, the bin achieves stable stacking arrangements without adding mechanical complexity. The predetermined angles ensure proper alignment and stability during stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rotatable handle is added for liner retention, then liner security is improved, but handle positioning requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner securityVSAvoidhandle positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The handle is designed to be rotatable rather than fixed, allowing it to move between different positions. This dynamic capability enables the handle to assume multiple orientations, including positioning over the rear wall of the bin for enhanced liner retention. The rotatable feature provides operational flexibility while maintaining secure liner holding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8833593B2Residential recycling bin
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 ORBIS CANADA
  • US8833593B2 patent drawing
  • US8833593B2 patent drawing
  • US8833593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A recycling bin has left and right sidewalls, a base, and front wall. The front wall is lower than the other three walls, and when two bins are stacked in a 0° stacking configuration, the lower front wall of the lower bin and a sloped surface on the lower portion of the upper bin create a recyclable receiving chute. When stacked, the upper bin is held to the lower bin by a combination of a channel on the lower rear portion of the base fitting over a handle resting upon an upper portion of the rear wall. A lower lip on the lower portion of the rear wall aligns with the handle and substantially prevents front-wards and backwards motion of the upper bin. A portion of the handle fits within a top open portion of the rear wall. The bin also has a plurality of inverted “V” shaped liner retainers.