Redundant Electrohydraulic Brake System for Automated Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrohydraulic brake systems for vehicles are not suitable for highly automated or independent driving as they fail to ensure safe braking without driver intervention in case of system failures, as they lack redundancy for wheel-specific brake pressure control and ESP functions.

Innovation Solution

A redundant brake system is introduced with a second electrohydraulic brake control device and an electrically controllable brake booster, connected in series with the wheel brakes, allowing for independent wheel-specific brake control and ESP functions, ensuring safe braking even with single system errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single electrohydraulic brake control device is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of the brake system for highly automated driving is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system reliabilityVSAvoidbrake control device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake control system is divided into two independent brake control devices (first and second), each capable of independently controlling brake pressures. This segmentation provides redundancy so that if one device fails, the other can take over, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through functional division

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a backup brake control device that stands ready to take over in case of failure. This preemptive redundancy ensures that brake system reliability is maintained even when failures occur, as the secondary device is already in place to compensate for the primary device's failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Adaptability or versatility

If wheel-specific brake pressure control is implemented, then the ESP function is enabled, but the device complexity increases due to additional pressure control valves

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESP function capabilityVSAvoidpressure control valve complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each brake control device is designed to perform multiple functions: it can control brake pressures for normal braking operations and also provide wheel-specific pressure control for ESP functions. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve adaptability without requiring separate dedicated components for each function, thereby managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If the brake system is designed for remote control without driver intervention, then the extent of automation is improved, but the reliability requirement becomes more stringent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control capabilityVSAvoidbrake function availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The brake system incorporates redundant brake control devices and a backup vacuum brake booster that can take over in case of failure. This preemptive redundancy ensures that the brake function remains available even when automation operates without driver intervention, meeting the stringent reliability requirements for highly automated driving

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum brake booster acts as an intermediary mechanical backup system that can provide brake pressure without electronic control. In case of electronic brake control device failure, this mechanical intermediary ensures that braking function remains available, thereby supporting remote control operation with high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures continuous safe braking and redundant wheel-individual brake control, enabling highly automated driving by allowing the second brake control device to take over in case of failures, ensuring wheel-specific brake pressures are maintained without driver intervention.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor (64) which is constructed to drive the hydraulic pump (63)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a hydraulic pump (63) which is constructed as an electrically controllable pressure source for actively and remotely controllable build-up of brake pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure generation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

pressure control valves (62) and an electrically controllable pump (63) for adjusting wheel-specific brake pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure control: Valve

Implementation Method 4

a vacuum brake booster (101) which is arranged upstream of the main brake cylinder (102)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum pressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10065613B2Brake system for vehicles
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US10065613B2 patent drawing
  • US10065613B2 patent drawing
  • US10065613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A brake system for vehicles, in particular motor vehicles, including a master brake cylinder, in particular a tandem master brake cylinder, a brake booster which is connected upstream of the master brake cylinder, in particular at least four hydraulically actuatable wheel brakes, and a first electrohydraulic brake control device which includes a first pressure regulating valve arrangement for adjusting wheel-specific brake pressures, in particular an electrically actuatable pressure source, and a wheel-specific outlet pressure connection for each wheel brake, wherein the brake booster is designed to be electrically actuatable, and a second electrohydraulic brake control device is provided which includes a second pressure regulating valve arrangement, in particular for adjusting wheel-specific brake pressures, and which is connected in series between the first brake control device and the wheel brakes.