Redundant Input Surface Detection for Unintentional Actuation Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing input devices, particularly those in safety-critical applications like vehicle cruise control systems, face challenges in ensuring functional safety due to the risk of unintentional actuation, especially when multiple input surfaces are closely arranged and small, necessitating improved detection methods to differentiate between intentional and unintentional touches.

Innovation Solution

The input device employs multiple detection devices, including touch and actuation detection systems, with capacitive and force-sensing technologies, to independently detect touches and actuations, using redundant detection mechanisms to ensure accurate triggering and prevent incorrect operations. This includes capacitive touch sensors and piezoelectric force sensors, with an evaluation unit requiring consensus from multiple detection devices for functional assignment, and haptic feedback for confirmation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple detection devices are provided for redundant detection, then functional safety and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional safetyVSAvoiddetection device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple detection devices (first and second detection devices) into a single input device structure, where both devices share the same input surface and evaluation unit. This merging approach enables redundant detection for improved functional safety while avoiding the complexity of completely separate detection systems, as the devices are integrated within a unified structural framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple detection devices are provided for redundant detection, then operational safety is improved, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidinput device volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested arrangement where the first and second detection devices are positioned adjacent to each other within the same input device housing, sharing common structural elements and the evaluation unit. This nesting strategy allows redundant detection functionality to be achieved without proportionally increasing the overall device volume, as both detection devices are efficiently packed within a compact integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Volume of stationary object

If input surfaces are arranged closely together to save space, then device compactness is improved, but the risk of unintentional activation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidunintentional activation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback through redundant detection, where both the first and second detection devices independently monitor the input surface. The evaluation unit processes signals from both devices to verify intentional activation, providing a feedback mechanism that distinguishes between accidental touches and deliberate user input, thereby preventing unintentional activation even when input surfaces are closely arranged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary verification through redundant detection before assigning switching or control functions. The evaluation unit requires confirmation from multiple detection devices before triggering an action, performing a preliminary check that ensures the activation is intentional. This preliminary action prevents unintentional activation before it can cause harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances operational safety by reliably distinguishing between intentional and unintentional inputs, preventing accidental activations and ensuring correct operation, while being implemented in a structurally simple and space-saving manner.

Implementation Method 1

The touch detection device includes, for example, an optical or capacitive touch sensor. A capacitive touch sensor defines at least one measuring capacitance, the influence of which is detected when the input surface is touched by the touch sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

The actuation detection device comprises at least one capacitive, resistive, and/or optical force sensor. At least one piezoelectric force sensor is provided as a force sensor for the actuation detection device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3342043B2Input device having redundant detection
Publication Date: 2023.10.18 PREH GMBH
  • EP3342043B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3342043B2 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3342043B2 patent drawingFigure 2c

AI summary

The invention relates to an input device (1), comprising at least one input surface (2), a plurality of detection apparatuses (T1, T2, F1, F2), which are designed to detect either touching of the input surface (2) or activation of the input surface (2) independently of each other, an evaluating unit (A), which is designed to assign a switching function or control function to the input device (1) in the event of activation or touching only in the case of detection by at least two of the detection apparatuses (T1, T2, F1, F2), characterized in that at least one detection apparatus (F1, F2) is designed to detect activation.