Reference Video Feedback for Cellular Live Stream Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cellular networks, particularly 5G networks, exhibit unpredictability leading to degraded video presentation due to congestion and packet loss, affecting video production projects with dispersed teams.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a closed-loop video quality measurement feedback system where reference video streams are encoded alongside live action streams, allowing for real-time adjustments of video encoding parameters and cellular network packet transmission parameters based on feedback from a video decoder node, using video encoding parameter feedback and cellular network feedback to improve video quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If video streams are transmitted over cellular networks to dispersed video production team members, then real-time remote video monitoring is enabled, but video quality degrades due to network congestion and packet loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time remote video monitoringVSAvoidvideo quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary encoding of reference video streams at the encoder node before transmission, and prepares comparison video streams at the decoder node in advance. This allows the feedback mechanism to operate proactively, adjusting encoding parameters before significant quality degradation occurs during network transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where the decoder node compares received reference video streams with local comparison video streams, generates quality assessment feedback, and sends it back to the encoder node. The encoder node uses this feedback to dynamically adjust encoding parameters, continuously improving video quality despite network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If video encoding parameters are adjusted to improve video quality, then video presentation quality improves, but system complexity increases due to feedback loops and parameter adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo presentation qualityVSAvoidencoding parameter adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated feedback loops where the decoder autonomously compares video streams, assesses quality, and sends feedback to the encoder. The encoder automatically adjusts encoding parameters based on received feedback without manual intervention, allowing the system to self-optimize video quality while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If reference video streams are encoded and transmitted alongside live action video streams, then video quality feedback can be generated, but network bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo quality feedback capabilityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by encoding reference video streams with specific encoding parameters tailored for feedback purposes, rather than using uniform high-quality encoding for all video streams. This allows optimized bandwidth usage while maintaining sufficient quality for accurate feedback generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by transmitting only reference video streams (not full-resolution live action streams) for feedback purposes. This provides sufficient information for quality assessment while consuming significantly less network bandwidth than transmitting complete video content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250365479A1Reference video quality measurement feedback
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 T MOBILE US INC
  • US20250365479A1 patent drawing
  • US20250365479A1 patent drawing
  • US20250365479A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches to preventing degraded video presentation use reference video quality measurement feedback from a video decoder node that is receiving live action video streams from a video encoder across a cellular network. A reference video stream is encoded along with the live action video streams, and the video decoder node compares the decoded reference video stream with a local copy to determine video quality. The video decoder node provides video encoding parameter feedback for adjusting the encoding and/or provides cellular network feedback for adjusting a transmission parameter for data traffic through the cellular network (from the video encoder node to the video decoder node). Solutions are disclosed for implementation at the video encoder, at the video decoder, and within the cellular network. For example, different compression codecs may be specified, and bit rates, frame, rates, key frame intervals, and/or bit depth may be automatically (immediately) adjusted without requiring human intervention.