Refrigeration system controlled by refrigerant quality within evaporator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Refrigeration systems with superheat control face inefficiencies due to sensitivity to temperature differences, wide fin spacing, low loads, and water content, leading to excessive inlet flashing and instability, particularly in low-temperature systems like those using ammonia, which require larger evaporators and compromise efficiency and capacity.

Innovation Solution

A refrigeration system with an evaporator featuring tubing with a smooth and continuous expansion in cross-sectional area, a compressor, and a condenser, where the refrigerant flow is controlled based on the quality of the refrigerant within the evaporator, using precooling to reduce flash vapor and stabilize expansion, and employing a controller to modulate liquid feed to ensure full wetting of the evaporator surface with minimal refrigerant evaporation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If superheat control is used in direct expansion systems, then the refrigeration system can operate with a standard evaporator design, but the system experiences excessive inlet flashing, pressure drop, and instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidinlet flashing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from superheat (temperature-based) to refrigerant quality (phase composition-based). This parameter change allows the system to maintain stability without excessive inlet flashing, as quality control directly monitors and adjusts for the liquid-vapor ratio in the evaporator, preventing the harmful flashing effect that occurs with conventional superheat control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system that continuously measures refrigerant quality within the evaporator and adjusts the expansion valve accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables real-time optimization of refrigerant distribution, maintaining system stability while preventing inlet flashing by responding to actual evaporator conditions rather than relying on indirect temperature measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If superheat control is used, then the evaporator can be designed with standard dimensions, but the evaporator size must be increased by 20% to 30% to accommodate dry conditions for superheat development

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuperheat control capabilityVSAvoidevaporator size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By changing from temperature-based superheat control to phase-based quality control, the patent eliminates the need for oversized evaporators. Quality control allows effective operation with smaller evaporator volumes because it directly manages the liquid-vapor distribution, enabling full utilization of the evaporator surface area without requiring the additional 20%-30% capacity needed for superheat development in conventional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Temperature

If superheat control is used in low-temperature systems, then the system can operate at temperatures around 0°F, but liquid refrigerant is expelled from the evaporator requiring large liquid traps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporator temperatureVSAvoidliquid refrigerant expulsion
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system continuously monitors refrigerant quality in low-temperature evaporators and adjusts expansion to maintain optimal liquid-vapor ratios. This prevents the liquid refrigerant expulsion that occurs in conventional superheat-controlled low-temperature systems, eliminating the need for large liquid traps while maintaining effective operation at temperatures around 0°F and below.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By controlling based on refrigerant quality rather than superheat temperature, the patent fundamentally changes how low-temperature systems manage phase distribution. This parameter change enables precise control of liquid refrigerant expansion, preventing expulsion and eliminating the need for oversized liquid separation equipment while maintaining effective cooling at low temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If superheat control is used, then the refrigeration system can maintain cooling, but efficiency and capacity are compromised due to negative compromises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from superheat to refrigerant quality, which directly optimizes the liquid-vapor ratio in the evaporator. This parameter change simultaneously improves both capacity and efficiency by ensuring optimal heat transfer conditions throughout the evaporator, eliminating the negative compromises inherent in superheat control where capacity and efficiency are traded off against each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances efficiency, reduces the size of evaporators, minimizes pressure drop, and eliminates the need for large liquid traps, allowing for more consistent and reliable operation across various temperature ranges without the drawbacks of superheat control.

Implementation Method 1

one or more lengths of tubing each having an upstream first cross-sectional area and a second downstream cross-sectional area, the second cross-sectional area being greater than the first cross-sectional area, the expansion in cross-sectional area between the first circular cross-sectional area and the second circular cross-sectional area being smooth and continuous

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a compressor and a condenser for converting the refrigerant from a gas to a liquid for introduction into the evaporator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

a compressor and a condenser for converting the refrigerant from a gas to a liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS10365018B2Refrigeration system controlled by refrigerant quality within evaporator
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 PDX TECH
  • US10365018B2 patent drawing
  • US10365018B2 patent drawing
  • US10365018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for cooling a refrigerant includes (a) an evaporator comprising one or more lengths of tubing each having an upstream first cross-sectional area and a second downstream cross-sectional area, the second cross-sectional area being greater than the first cross-sectional area, the expansion in cross-sectional area between the first circular cross-sectional area and the second circular cross-sectional area being smooth and continuous; and (b) a compressor and a condenser for converting the refrigerant from a gas to a liquid for introduction into the evaporator.