Refund Service Based on Degree Information and Image Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refund services are limited to full or non-refundable options, failing to account for subjective factors such as product expectations, leading to inefficient refund processing.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for providing a refund service based on refund degree information, where users can select a refund degree from preset stages or input a custom percentage, and the system determines approval or rejection based on image and comment information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If refund services are classified as fully refundable or non-refundable only, then the refund policy is simple to implement, but it fails to account for subjective factors and causes many problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund policy implementationVSAvoidrefund service adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the refund service into multiple refund degree stages (e.g., 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 100%) instead of using a single binary classification. This segmentation allows the system to handle subjective refund reasons more flexibly while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized stage options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic refund degree selection that adapts to different refund scenarios. Users can dynamically choose from multiple refund stages based on their specific situation, and the system dynamically processes different refund amounts accordingly, making the refund policy both adaptable and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If remote ordering is used, then delivery service efficiency is improved, but product quality verification becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery service efficiencyVSAvoidproduct quality verification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent requires users to upload product images before initiating the refund process. This preliminary action allows the system to verify product quality issues in advance, maintaining measurement precision while preserving the efficiency benefits of remote ordering. The image upload serves as a preliminary quality assessment step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical product inspection with an electronic image-based verification system. Users capture and upload product images, which are then processed by the system to verify quality issues, substituting hands-on inspection with digital documentation while maintaining verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple refund degree stages are provided, then user choice and fairness are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund degree optionsVSAvoidrefund system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages system complexity by standardizing refund degree as a discrete parameter with predefined stages (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 100%). This parameterization approach allows multiple refund options without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the refund degree becomes a controlled variable with fixed possible values rather than a continuous range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12321946B2Refund service providing method and apparatus based on refund degree information
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 OASIS CO LTD
  • US12321946B2 patent drawing
  • US12321946B2 patent drawing
  • US12321946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A refund service providing method comprises: selecting, by a user terminal, at least one product to be refunded from among at least one ordered product; obtaining, from the user terminal, refund request information including image information regarding the product to be refunded, refund degree information, and refund comment information; obtaining, from a terminal in charge of refunds, refund determination information regarding the refund degree information, based on the image information and the comment information, wherein the refund determination information includes information indicating approval or rejection; obtaining, from a terminal in charge of refunds, refund determination information regarding the refund degree information, based on the image information and the comment information, wherein the refund determination information includes information indicating approval or rejection; and when the refund determination information includes the information indicating approval, providing, to the user terminal, the information indicating approval and points according to the refund degree information.