Regenerative Braking Torque Control via Wheel Slip Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hybrid and electric vehicles face inefficiencies in regenerative braking during anti-lock braking events, as traditional systems deactivate regenerative braking to prevent wheel locking, leading to reduced energy recovery and prolonged braking distances.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that adjusts regenerative braking torque based on the difference between desired and actual wheel slip ratios, allowing simultaneous regenerative and anti-lock braking by coordinating electric machines and friction brakes to maintain optimal wheel slip and energy recovery during anti-lock braking events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If regenerative braking is deactivated during anti-lock braking events to prevent wheel locking, then wheel stability is improved, but energy recovery is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel stabilityVSAvoidenergy recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the regenerative braking torque based on real-time wheel slip ratio feedback. The controller continuously monitors the actual wheel slip ratio and modulates the electric machine torque to maintain optimal slip conditions, enabling regenerative braking to remain active during anti-lock braking events while preventing wheel lockup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements a feedback mechanism where the actual wheel slip ratio is measured and compared against a desired slip ratio threshold. Based on this feedback, the controller adjusts the regenerative braking torque in real-time, allowing the system to maintain both wheel stability and energy recovery simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If regenerative braking is deactivated during anti-lock braking events, then wheel lockup is prevented, but braking distance is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel lockup preventionVSAvoidbraking distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic torque modulation where the regenerative braking torque is continuously adjusted based on wheel slip ratio feedback. This allows the electric machine to provide optimal braking force that prevents wheel lockup while maximizing deceleration efficiency, thereby reducing braking distance compared to complete deactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes the operating parameters of the regenerative braking system by adjusting torque levels based on slip ratio conditions. By maintaining regenerative braking within optimal parameter ranges during anti-lock events, the system achieves both lockup prevention and reduced braking distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If regenerative braking torque is increased during anti-lock braking events, then energy recovery is improved, but wheel slip control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidwheel slip control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback from wheel slip ratio sensors to continuously adjust regenerative braking torque. This closed-loop control ensures that energy recovery is maximized while maintaining precise wheel slip control, as the controller can immediately respond to any slip condition changes by modulating the electric machine torque.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the regenerative braking torque levels based on current wheel slip conditions rather than using fixed torque values. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize energy recovery at each moment while preventing wheel lockup, making high energy recovery compatible with easy slip control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient energy recovery during anti-lock braking events, reducing braking distances and improving vehicle stability while maintaining regenerative braking functionality, thus enhancing overall vehicle performance and fuel efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

During regenerative braking, an electric machine may operate as a generator to convert the kinetic energy of the vehicle into electrical energy which is in turn used to charge a battery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The friction brakes are configured to apply torque to wheels of the vehicle to decelerate the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10723229B1Regenerative braking control system
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10723229B1 patent drawing
  • US10723229B1 patent drawing
  • US10723229B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes an electric machine, friction brakes, and a controller. The electric machine is configured to recharge a battery during regenerative braking. The friction brakes are configured to apply torque to wheels of the vehicle to decelerate the vehicle. The controller is programmed to, responsive to an anti-lock braking event, adjust a regenerative braking torque of the electric machine based on a difference between a desired wheel slip ratio and an actual wheel slip ratio.