Remote Operator Control System for Rail Vehicle Crew Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The inefficiency of requiring a two-person crew to operate a rail vehicle, where the engineer is limited to staying in the locomotive cabin due to operational constraints, preventing them from performing conductor tasks, leading to suboptimal labor utilization.

Innovation Solution

A remote operator control system that enables communication with on-board systems like the positive train control (PTC) and energy management system (EMS) via a communication link, allowing operators to maintain control authority and receive necessary information remotely, enabling them to perform other tasks while ensuring compliance with rail operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a two-person crew (engineer and conductor) operates the locomotive, then operational safety and control are maintained, but labor efficiency decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical presence of a second crew member in the cabin with an electronic remote control system. The engineer can remotely operate the locomotive controls via a portable device while performing conductor tasks, substituting physical dual-person operation with an automated remote control mechanism to maintain safety while improving labor efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a remote control system as an intermediary between the engineer and the locomotive controls. This intermediary device allows the engineer to maintain control authority without being physically present in the cabin, enabling them to perform other tasks while ensuring operational safety through remote monitoring and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the engineer stays in the locomotive cabin to maintain control authority, then operational control is maintained, but the engineer cannot perform conductor tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol authorityVSAvoidtask flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the control operation from a single location (cabin) to multiple locations by using a portable remote control device. The engineer can maintain control authority from any location within communication range, adding spatial freedom to the operation and enabling task flexibility while preserving control authority

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the engineer's role universal by enabling them to perform both locomotive operation and conductor tasks through the remote control system. The portable control device allows the engineer to switch between different functional roles (operator and conductor) without being constrained by physical location, enhancing task flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the engineer leaves the cabin to perform conductor tasks, then labor optimization is achieved, but control authority and safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor optimizationVSAvoidcontrol authority
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through the remote control system that continuously monitors locomotive status and communicates with the engineer. This feedback loop ensures that the engineer maintains real-time awareness of operational conditions while remotely controlling the locomotive, preserving control authority and safety even when away from the cabin

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the physical presence requirement for control authority with an electronic remote control system. This substitution allows the engineer to optimize labor utilization by performing conductor tasks while maintaining full control authority through the portable control device, eliminating the trade-off between location and authority

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2455270B1System and method for remotely controlling rail vehicles
Publication Date: 2018.03.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2455270B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2455270B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2455270B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for remotely controlling a rail vehicle (100) are provided. In one embodiment, a remote operator control system (142) includes a communication link (148) to send and receive rail vehicle information (118,136), an operator interface (146), and a controller (150). The controller (150) is configured to send, through the communication link (148), a request to establish communication with a positive train control system (110) on-board a selected rail vehicle (100) based on an operating condition. In response to receiving confirmation of communication with the positive train control system (110), the controller (150) is configured to receive positive train control information for the selected rail vehicle (100) through the communication link (148), and display the positive train control information for the selected rail vehicle (100) on the operator interface (146).