Remote Vehicle Control Authority Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving systems face safety concerns and user inconvenience due to driver intervention during remote control, as well as challenges in managing vehicle flow and zones, especially when drivers are prohibited from operating the vehicle during autonomous driving.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for remotely controlling a vehicle that identifies autonomous driving authority information and blocks user operations while allowing discretionary control for specific electronic elements, ensuring the vehicle follows a set path within an autonomous driving region, thereby enhancing safety and user convenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver operation is absolutely prohibited during autonomous driving, then safety is improved, but user convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vehicle control system into multiple independent control modules (accelerator control, steering control, brake control, electronic device control) with different authority levels. This allows selective blocking of critical driving functions while permitting non-critical operations, resolving the contradiction between safety and user convenience by enabling differentiated control permissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements location-based authority management where the autonomous driving authority information varies according to the vehicle's position within the autonomous driving region. Different zones can have different levels of permitted user operation, allowing safety-critical areas to restrict operations while permitting operations in safer zones, thus balancing safety requirements with user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If driver operation is allowed during autonomous driving, then user convenience is improved, but safety deteriorates due to possible collision accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the level of user operation permission based on real-time conditions including vehicle location within the autonomous driving region and current driving state. The authority information is not fixed but can be modified according to environmental factors and operational context, allowing the system to permit operations when safe and restrict them when hazardous conditions exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors vehicle operations and environmental conditions, using this feedback to adjust authority permissions in real-time. The remote server receives vehicle state information and updates authority information accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing conditions to maintain safety while enabling convenient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If autonomous driving is fixed to predetermined speed and direction, then safety is improved, but manager control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmanager control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces fixed predetermined paths with dynamic trajectory generation based on real-time environmental perception and manager authority information. The vehicle can adapt its speed and direction according to actual road conditions, traffic situations, and manager-defined constraints, providing both safety through controlled operation and versatility through adaptive routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows manager-defined parameter ranges for speed, direction, and other operational variables rather than fixed values. This enables managers to specify acceptable operational envelopes that balance safety requirements with operational flexibility, allowing the vehicle to vary parameters within authorized ranges to adapt to different situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10528045B2Method and apparatus for remotely controlling vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 INFOBANK
  • US10528045B2 patent drawing
  • US10528045B2 patent drawing
  • US10528045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is a method of remotely controlling a vehicle, which includes identifying a vehicle entering an autonomous driving region, identifying autonomous driving authority information including a predetermined user's discretionary control right to the vehicle entering the autonomous driving region, remotely controlling a plurality of electronic elements included in the vehicle such that the vehicle moves along a set path corresponding to the autonomous driving region, and blocking a user's vehicle operation while autonomous driving is performed according to the remote control while allowing user's discretionary control for at least one of the plurality of electronic elements according to the autonomous driving authority information.