Removable Electrode Pushing Assembly for Glass Furnace Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanisms for compensating electrode corrosion in glass melting furnaces are complex and expensive, necessitating improvements for efficient and cost-effective operation.

Innovation Solution

An electrode pushing assembly comprising a frame assembly with independently removable driving assemblies and a push frame that exerts a pushing force against the electrode, allowing for easy maintenance and reduced downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing mechanisms are used to compensate for electrode corrosion, then electrode replacement is achieved, but device complexity and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode replacement capabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pushing assembly is divided into separate functional modules: a pushing member that contacts the electrode, a pushing rod that transmits force, and a driving assembly that provides motion. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies maintenance by enabling separate replacement of individual modules without affecting the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The driving assembly incorporates a motor that can be selectively activated to push the electrode when corrosion requires replacement. The system transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one where the motor can be engaged or disengaged based on operational needs, allowing flexible electrode management without complex automated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If existing pushing mechanisms are implemented, then electrode corrosion compensation is achieved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode compensation capabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pushing assembly is designed to be manually operated through simple mechanical input (turning the driving assembly handle or activating the motor), eliminating the need for complex automated control systems. This self-service design reduces operational costs by requiring minimal skilled labor and reducing energy consumption compared to automated mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The pushing assembly uses simple, readily available materials such as metal rods, motors, and mechanical linkages that are cost-effective to manufacture and replace. The design prioritizes functional simplicity over durability, allowing components to be easily replaced if worn, thereby reducing overall operational costs despite shorter component lifetimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If complex pushing mechanisms are used, then electrode movement is achieved, but maintenance difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode movement capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The pushing assembly is divided into separate functional modules: a pushing member that contacts the electrode, a pushing rod that transmits force, and a driving assembly that provides motion. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies maintenance by enabling separate replacement of individual modules without affecting the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motor and driving assembly are designed as removable components that can be extracted from the main pushing mechanism. This extraction allows the motor to be serviced or replaced independently without disassembling the entire pushing assembly, significantly reducing maintenance complexity and downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If existing pushing mechanisms are implemented, then electrode replacement is achieved, but process downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode replacement capabilityVSAvoidprocess downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The driving assembly incorporates a motor that can be selectively activated to push the electrode when corrosion requires replacement. The system transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one where the motor can be engaged or disengaged based on operational needs, allowing flexible electrode management without complex automated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pushing assembly is pre-configured with all necessary components (pushing member, pushing rod, driving assembly) in position and ready for immediate operation. When electrode replacement is needed, the system can be activated without requiring assembly or configuration time, as the entire mechanism is pre-positioned and functional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260035277A1Pushing assembly and method for glass melting furnace electrodes
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 CORNING INC
  • US20260035277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035277A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrode pushing assembly and method includes a frame assembly, a plurality of driving assemblies fixedly coupled to the frame assembly, and a push frame coupled to the plurality of driving assemblies and configured to exert a pushing force against the electrode. The plurality of driving assemblies are configured to move the push frame and are each independently removable from the frame assembly and the push frame.