Repair Welding Control Using Defect Ranking and Robot Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current repair welding methods require manual operation and are prone to instability due to individual skill variations and erroneous determinations, leading to inconsistent welding quality.

Innovation Solution

A repair welding system comprising an inspection device and a robot control device that automatically detects defective welds, assigns defect ranks, and generates repair welding programs to efficiently correct defects using integrated inspection and repair welding robots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual operation is used for repair welding, then flexibility in handling different defect types is improved, but welding quality consistency deteriorates due to individual skill variations and erroneous determinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling different defect typesVSAvoidwelding quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The repair welding process is segmented into distinct phases: inspection phase (detecting defective portions and determining defect types), decision phase (determining whether repair welding is necessary based on defect type), and execution phase (performing repair welding). This segmentation allows automated robots to handle routine tasks consistently while maintaining flexibility for different defect types through programmed decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where inspection results (defect detection and classification) directly inform the repair welding execution. The inspection device provides real-time feedback on welded portion quality, enabling automated adjustment of repair parameters and ensuring consistent quality control across different defect types without relying on manual judgment variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated repair welding is implemented, then welding quality consistency is improved, but adaptability to different defect types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality consistencyVSAvoidadaptability to different defect types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated repair welding system is designed with multi-functionality to handle multiple defect types (defective penetration, defective shape, defective discontinuity) using a single integrated platform. The robot controller contains programmable logic that can adapt to different defect characteristics, enabling one automated system to perform multiple repair functions while maintaining consistent quality standards across all defect types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts welding parameters (current, voltage, speed, torch position) based on the detected defect type and characteristics. This dynamic parameter modification allows the automated system to adapt its welding process to different defect scenarios while maintaining quality consistency, resolving the contradiction between automation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive inspection of all welded portions is performed, then defect detection accuracy is improved, but inspection time and system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system focuses on local quality assessment by specifically examining welded portions that exhibit abnormal characteristics or are prone to defects. Rather than uniformly inspecting all welded portions with equal detail, the system applies enhanced inspection to critical areas while using faster scanning for routine areas, improving detection accuracy for actual defects while reducing overall inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial inspection in the sense that it prioritizes inspection of welded portions based on risk assessment and defect probability. By concentrating inspection resources on portions most likely to contain defects or those with critical quality requirements, the system achieves high detection accuracy for actual defects without the time cost of exhaustive inspection of every welded portion at maximum detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12145219B2Repair welding system, repair welding method, inspection device, and robot control device
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US12145219B2 patent drawing
  • US12145219B2 patent drawing
  • US12145219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A repair welding system includes an inspection device configured to inspect an appearance of a welded portion of a workpiece, and a robot control device that controls a robot configured to weld the workpiece. The inspection device determines whether there is a defective portion among welded portions of the workpiece based on a predetermined standard, and sets one of a plurality of defect ranks to the defective portion in a case that the defective portion is detected. The robot control device generates a repair welding program corresponding to the defect rank, and instructs the robot to execute, in accordance with the repair welding program, a repair welding on the defective portion to which the defect rank is set.