Residue Hydrocracking Sediment Control via Segmented Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ebullated bed hydrocracking processes face challenges with asphaltenic sediment formation downstream, leading to reduced conversion efficiency and product quality, as existing methods fail to effectively mitigate sediment deposition and improve product quality.

Innovation Solution

A process involving ebullated bed reactors, followed by a hydrotreating catalyst in an upflow reactor and a stripper, where hydrogen is used to contact the effluent with both residue and distillate hydrotreating catalysts, separating hydrocarbon fractions to reduce sediment formation and enhance product quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ebullated bed hydrocracking is used to increase conversion rates, then productivity is improved, but asphaltenic sediment formation increases downstream

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidasphaltenic sediment formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrocracking process is divided into two distinct stages: an ebullated bed reactor for high conversion and a fixed bed reactor specifically for sediment control. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, with the fixed bed stage removing asphaltenic sediments generated by the high-conversion ebullated bed stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed bed reactor acts as an intermediary stage between the ebullated bed reactor and downstream equipment. It provides a transition zone where asphaltenic sediments are controlled and removed, protecting downstream equipment while maintaining the high productivity benefits of ebullated bed hydrocracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If thermal cracking is increased to improve conversion, then productivity is improved, but product quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion extentVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments thermal cracking and catalytic conversion into separate stages. The ebullated bed reactor performs the harsh thermal cracking for high conversion, while the fixed bed reactor with its different catalyst provides controlled catalytic hydroconversion to improve product quality in the second stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes operational parameters between stages: the ebullated bed reactor operates under conditions favorable for high conversion (higher temperature, shorter residence time), while the fixed bed reactor operates under conditions favorable for product quality (lower temperature, longer residence time, different catalyst type).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces asphaltenic sediment formation and improves the quality of hydrocarbon products by increasing conversion rates and removing contaminants like sulfur and metals, thereby stabilizing the unconverted oil and enhancing downstream processing.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a residuum hydrocarbon fraction and hydrogen with a hydroconversion catalyst in a hydrocracking reaction zone to convert at least a portion of the residuum hydrocarbon fraction to lighter hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

contacting hydrogen and at least a portion of the effluent with a resid hydrotreating catalyst to remove contaminants like sulfur and metals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 3

contacting hydrogen and the effluent with a first resid hydrotreating catalyst in an upflow reactor; contact hydrogen and the heavy hydrocarbon fraction with a second resid hydrotreating catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

separating the effluent to recover two or more hydrocarbon fractions comprising at least a heavy hydrocarbon fraction and a light hydrocarbon fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 5

a hydrocracking reaction zone comprising one or more ebullated bed reactors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentEP2880132B1Residue hydrocracking
Publication Date: 2023.06.14 LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC
  • EP2880132B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2880132B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2880132B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A process for upgrading residuum hydrocarbons and decreasing tendency of the resulting products toward asphaltenic sediment formation in downstream processes is disclosed. The process may include: contacting a residuum hydrocarbon fraction and hydrogen with a hydroconversion catalyst in a hydrocracking reaction zone to convert at least a portion of the residuum hydrocarbon fraction to lighter hydrocarbons; recovering an effluent from the hydrocracking reaction zone; contacting hydrogen and at least a portion of the effluent with a resid hydrotreating catalyst; and separating the effluent to recover two or more hydrocarbon fractions.