Resin-Metal Vehicle Pipe Holder with Interposed Bracket

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle pipe holders are not optimized for size reduction, which is increasingly demanded due to the need for smaller devices and components in vehicles, while maintaining the ability to stably hold multiple pipes without significant dimensional errors or weight issues.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle pipe holder design featuring a resin-made holding member with separate metal mounting brackets that interpose between holding portions, allowing for compact size and enhanced stability by distributing the load and reinforcing the structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the pipe holder size is reduced, then the device becomes more compact and space-efficient, but the structural strength and stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe holder sizeVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe holder combines resin and metal materials to create a composite structure. The resin holding member provides the basic holding function and can be made compact, while the metal mounting bracket reinforces the structure at critical mounting points, ensuring sufficient strength despite the reduced overall size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The pipe holder is divided into separate functional components: a resin holding member for gripping the pipes and a separate metal mounting bracket for structural support and vehicle mounting. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the holding member can be small and compact while the mounting bracket provides concentrated structural reinforcement where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If a single integrated holding member is used, then the structure is simpler, but the load-bearing capacity and stability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidholding stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The holding function and mounting function are separated into distinct components - the resin holding member with its holding portions for pipes, and the separate metal mounting bracket for vehicle mounting. This functional segmentation allows each part to be specialized and optimized for its specific purpose while working together as a system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The holding connection portion acts as an intermediary element that couples the resin holding member to the metal mounting bracket. This connection structure enables the two different materials and functional zones to work together, transferring loads between the holding portions and the mounting bracket while maintaining the benefits of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the mounting bracket is integrated with the holding member, then the number of parts is reduced, but the ability to distribute load and reduce dimensional error is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of partsVSAvoiddimensional error
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The holding member and mounting bracket are manufactured as separate components with distinct functional requirements. The resin holding member can be molded with high precision for the holding portions, while the metal mounting bracket can be separately fabricated with precise mounting features. This separation allows each component to be manufactured and quality-checked independently, reducing cumulative dimensional errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If metal material is used throughout, then the strength and rigidity are high, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength and rigidityVSAvoidpipe holder weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Metal material is used locally only in the mounting bracket where high strength and rigidity are required for vehicle mounting and load-bearing. The holding member that contacts the pipes is made of lighter resin material, reducing overall weight while maintaining sufficient strength at the critical mounting locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pipe holder uses a composite construction combining resin and metal materials in appropriate locations. The resin providing lightweight holding functionality and the metal providing localized structural reinforcement, achieving an optimal balance between weight and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11498502B2Vehicle pipe holder
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 TOYODA GOSEI CO LTD
  • US11498502B2 patent drawing
  • US11498502B2 patent drawing
  • US11498502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle pipe holder configured to hold two or more pipes in a vehicle, the vehicle pipe holder includes: a holding member that is made of resin and that includes a first holding portion configured to hold one of the pipes, a second holding portion configured to hold another one of the pipes, and a holding connection portion that couples the first holding portion and the second holding portion; and a mounting bracket that is made of metal, that is separate from the holding member, and that includes a vehicle mounting portion configured to be mounted to a vehicle and an insertion opening configured to be inserted with the holding connection portion. The mounting bracket is configured to be disposed between the first holding portion and the second holding portion upon assembly of the holding member and the mounting bracket.