Retractable Shielding Unit for Multi-Size Wafer Plasma Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plasma tools are often incompatible with multiple wafer sizes, requiring separate tools for each size, which increases production costs and maintenance time due to exposure of chuck components to corrosive ionized gases, leading to frequent replacements and downtime.

Innovation Solution

A plasma tool with a shielding unit that can adjust its central opening to accommodate different wafer sizes, using retractable plates made of resistant materials to protect the chuck from ionized etchant gas atoms, allowing for processing of various wafer diameters within the same tool.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single plasma tool is used to process multiple wafer sizes, then device versatility and productivity are improved, but the chuck components are exposed to corrosive ionized gases causing damage and requiring frequent maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer size compatibilityVSAvoidchuck component durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shielding unit is divided into multiple retractable plates that can be independently positioned. Each plate can be extended or retracted to provide selective protection to different regions of the chuck, allowing the system to adapt to various wafer sizes while protecting only the necessary portions of the chuck from plasma exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retractable plates serve as an intermediary barrier between the plasma source and the chuck. These plates can be positioned to block corrosive ionized gases from reaching the chuck surface, thereby protecting the chuck components while still allowing plasma processing to occur on the wafer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If separate plasma tools are used for each wafer size, then chuck component protection is improved, but production cost and maintenance time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechuck component protectionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The plasma tool is designed with a universal chuck that can accommodate multiple wafer sizes through the addition of adapter rings. The retractable plates provide universal protection capability across different wafer sizes, eliminating the need for multiple dedicated tools while maintaining chuck protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The retractable plates can be dynamically adjusted between extended and retracted positions based on the specific processing requirements. This dynamic adjustment allows the same tool to optimize protection for different wafer sizes without requiring physical reconfiguration or replacement of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If retractable plates are extended to protect the chuck, then chuck protection from ionized gases is improved, but plasma source to substrate exposure is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechuck protection levelVSAvoidplasma processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractable plates provide localized protection only to the specific regions of the chuck that require protection from plasma exposure. The plates can be positioned to shield the chuck periphery while leaving the central processing area open, ensuring that plasma processing efficiency is maintained in the substrate area while protecting the chuck components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shielding is applied partially rather than completely - only the necessary portions of the chuck are protected by the retractable plates. This partial shielding approach provides sufficient protection to prevent chuck damage while minimizing interference with the plasma processing of the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient processing of wafers of different sizes using a single tool, reducing production costs and maintenance time by minimizing damage to the chuck and extending tool functionality.

Implementation Method 1

positioning a shield between a plasma source and the chuck. The shield covers a peripheral region of the chuck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier shielding:

Data Source

PatentUS10043640B2Process tools and methods of forming devices using process tools
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10043640B2 patent drawing
  • US10043640B2 patent drawing
  • US10043640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a process tool includes a chuck configured to hold a substrate. The chuck is disposed in a chamber. The process tool further includes a shielding unit with a central opening. The shielding unit is disposed in the chamber over the chuck.