Ribbed Throttle Valve Plate Design for Backfire Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Throttle assembly valves require structural robustness to withstand backfire tests while being lightweight and cost-effective, posing a challenge in balancing weight, cost, and durability.

Innovation Solution

A valve plate design featuring a flat plate with overmolded plastic and ribbed features, allowing for a thinner, lighter, and more cost-effective construction that maintains structural integrity, including a two-piece design with overlapping flanges and ribs for enhanced strength and rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the valve plate thickness is increased to withstand backfire tests, then structural robustness and rigidity are improved, but weight and inertia loading increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural robustnessVSAvoidvalve plate weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding ribs only in specific areas where structural support is needed, rather than uniformly thickening the entire valve plate. The ribs are strategically positioned to provide localized reinforcement that withstands backfire pressures while keeping the overall plate thin and lightweight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction by combining a thin base plate material with rib structures that may be made of different materials or have different properties. This composite approach allows the valve plate to achieve the strength of thicker materials while maintaining the weight benefits of a thin plate design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the valve plate thickness is increased to pass backfire tests, then structural rigidity is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of manufacturing an entirely thick and expensive valve plate, the patent uses local quality by adding rib structures only where needed for rigidity. This allows the majority of the plate to remain thin and inexpensive to manufacture, while specific areas gain the necessary structural properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the valve plate into a base plate and separate rib structures. This segmentation allows for more efficient manufacturing processes, such as stamping or injection molding the ribs separately or as integrated features, rather than requiring expensive machining or forging of a uniformly thick plate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If the valve plate is made thinner to reduce weight, then inertia loading is reduced, but structural robustness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve plate weightVSAvoidstructural robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by maintaining a thin overall plate thickness for weight reduction while adding localized rib structures in areas requiring structural robustness. The ribs provide the necessary strength to withstand backfire tests without requiring the entire plate to be thick.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing thickness in the vertical dimension, the patent adds structural support by extending ribs in horizontal dimensions across the plate surface. This dimensional approach provides structural reinforcement while maintaining the thin profile and low weight of the base plate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If traditional thick valve plates are used to ensure durability, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve durabilityVSAvoidvalve plate structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the overall device by using a thin plate with localized rib features, rather than a uniformly thick complex structure. The ribs are strategically placed only where structural support is needed, reducing unnecessary material and simplifying manufacturing while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential structural support functions from a traditional thick plate design by removing unnecessary material and retaining only the critical rib structures needed for durability. This extraction simplifies the overall device while preserving the reliability needed to pass backfire tests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11591988B2Throttle plate
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 VITESCO TECH USA LLS
  • US11591988B2 patent drawing
  • US11591988B2 patent drawing
  • US11591988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve, such as a throttle valve plate, which is suitable for use with a throttle assembly, and is able to withstand a backpressure test. The throttle valve plate includes a flat plate, and a plastic material overmolded onto a portion of the valve plate. The plate includes at least one rib, and may include a plurality of ribs, allowing for a thinner and lighter weight plate which is manufactured at a lower cost. The valve may also be a two-piece valve plate having an overlap portion. The two pieces of the valve plate overlap at the portion of the valve plate which interfaces with the shaft of the throttle assembly. The remaining portion of the plate surface includes at least one ribbed feature, and may include a plurality of ribbed features which reduce material usage and therefore reduce weight and cost, but also provide the required strength and rigidity.