Ring MEMS Resonator Anchoring for Low-Loss Linear Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low-frequency MEMS resonators face challenges with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and nonlinearity due to small resonant frequency and effective spring stiffness, leading to mechanical loss and frequency instability, especially in shuttle resonator designs with asymmetric modes and nonlinear spring behavior.

Innovation Solution

A ring-shaped MEMS resonator with comb-drives attached to a closed ring structure, anchored at quasi-nodal points to minimize mechanical loss and enhance linearity, allowing for larger vibration amplitudes and improved electromechanical coupling, resulting in higher quality factor and linear frequency response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If shuttle resonator design is used with asymmetric modes, then low-frequency operation is achieved, but mechanical loss increases and quality factor decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonant frequencyVSAvoidmechanical loss
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry principle by designing a resonator with asymmetric electrode placement relative to the neutral axis. The first electrode is positioned at a first distance from the neutral axis while the second electrode is positioned at a second distance, creating asymmetric actuation that generates both bending and stretching modes. This asymmetric configuration enables the resonator to operate at low frequencies while maintaining low mechanical loss through the stretching mode, resolving the contradiction between low-frequency operation and mechanical loss reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Measurement precision

If large vibration amplitude is used to compensate for low motional current, then SNR improves, but nonlinearity increases in shuttle resonators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidfrequency stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by utilizing the stretching mode of the resonator, which exhibits linear spring behavior even at large vibration amplitudes. By operating in the stretching mode rather than relying on bending modes, the resonator maintains frequency stability and linearity while achieving large vibration amplitudes necessary for high signal-to-noise ratio. This parameter change in operational mode resolves the contradiction between improving SNR through large amplitude and maintaining frequency stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If effective spring stiffness is increased to reduce mechanical loss, then quality factor improves, but vibration amplitude decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical lossVSAvoidvibration amplitude
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics principle by utilizing the stretching mode of the resonator, which dynamically maintains linear spring behavior across large vibration amplitudes. The stretching mode allows the resonator to achieve both high effective spring stiffness (reducing mechanical loss) and large vibration amplitude simultaneously, unlike conventional bending modes where increased stiffness limits amplitude. This dynamic operational characteristic resolves the contradiction between improving quality factor and maintaining large vibration amplitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ring-shaped resonator design achieves significantly higher quality factor and linearity compared to shuttle resonators, enabling stable operation at larger amplitudes and lower pressures, with a wider operational range and reduced mechanical loss, thus enhancing the SNR and frequency stability.

Implementation Method 1

In capacitive MEMS resonators, the resonant structure is actuated by an electrostatic force which acts over an actuation gap. The electrostatic actuation can be based on either the parallel-plate or comb-drive principle.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

To sense the vibration of the structure, a capacitance change between the structure and a fixed electrode, separated by a sensing gap (sometimes also by the same actuation gap) is used as output signal.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance change: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

The MEMS resonator consists of a silicon mass-spring system, which can be excited into mechanical resonant vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical resonant vibration: Resonance

Data Source

PatentEP2544370B1MEMS resonator
Publication Date: 2020.01.01 NXP BV
  • EP2544370B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2544370B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2544370B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A MEMS resonator has a resonator mass in the form of a closed ring anchored at points around the ring. A set of ring comb electrode arrangements is fixed to the ring at locations between the anchor points, to couple the input (drive) and output (sense) signals to/from the resonator mass.