RNA-Guided Genome Editing Without Bacterial RNA Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for genome editing in eukaryotic cells, such as ZFNs and TALENs, are inefficient and can cause toxicity, while bacterial CRISPR systems require complex RNA processing machinery.

Innovation Solution

A two-component system using RNA complementary to genomic DNA and an enzyme, like Cas9, is expressed in eukaryotic cells to bind and cleave genomic DNA in a site-specific manner, avoiding bacterial RNA processing and reducing toxicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If bacterial CRISPR systems are used for genome editing in eukaryotic cells, then genome editing capability is achieved, but system complexity and off-target effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome editing capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential functional components (Cas9 enzyme and guide RNA) from the complex bacterial CRISPR system, eliminating the need for bacterial RNA processing machinery while retaining genome editing capability. This simplification reduces system complexity and potential sources of error in eukaryotic cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into two independent components: a Cas9 enzyme component and a guide RNA component. These can be separately optimized, delivered, and controlled in eukaryotic cells, allowing for simplified system architecture compared to the integrated bacterial system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If bacterial CRISPR systems are used for genome editing in eukaryotic cells, then genome editing capability is achieved, but off-target effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome editing capabilityVSAvoidoff-target effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies key parameters of the guide RNA including length (20-100 nucleotides), sequence composition, and structural features to optimize binding specificity in eukaryotic cells. These parameter changes enhance target discrimination and reduce off-target cleavage events while maintaining editing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex bacterial RNA processing machinery is used, then CRISPR system functionality is maintained, but ease of operation in eukaryotic cells decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCRISPR system functionalityVSAvoidease of operation in eukaryotic cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for bacterial RNA processing machinery by providing guide RNA that is directly functional in eukaryotic cells. The guide RNA is designed with appropriate length and structure to function independently of bacterial processing enzymes, greatly simplifying transfection and expression in eukaryotic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If guide RNA length is increased to improve specificity, then binding specificity increases, but RNA stability and delivery efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding specificityVSAvoidRNA stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies an optimal guide RNA length range (20-100 nucleotides, preferably 20-50 nucleotides) that balances binding specificity with RNA stability and deliverability. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient target discrimination while maintaining adequate half-life and transfection efficiency in eukaryotic cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient and rapid homologous recombination and targeted DNA editing with minimal toxicity, allowing for precise genome modifications across multiple sites.

Implementation Method 1

The RNA hybridizes with complementary genomic DNA

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHybridization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

the enzyme then performs a function, such as cleavage of the genomic DNA

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic cleavage: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS12612643B2RNA-guided human genome engineering
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US12612643B2 patent drawing
  • US12612643B2 patent drawing
  • US12612643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of altering a eukaryotic cell is provided including transfecting the eukaryotic cell with a nucleic acid encoding RNA complementary to genomic DNA of the eukaryotic cell, transfecting the eukaryotic cell with a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that interacts with the RNA and cleaves the genomic DNA in a site specific manner, wherein the cell expresses the RNA and the enzyme, the RNA binds to complementary genomic DNA and the enzyme cleaves the genomic DNA in a site specific manner.