Extensible Robot Arm Locking Mechanism for Rigid Body Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing linearly-extensible and retractable arm mechanisms for robots do not form a sufficiently secure rigid body when separated, leading to instability and potential safety concerns in applications where precision and safety near humans are critical.

Innovation Solution

The mechanism consists of a first structure group coupled with a second structure group, where lock parts fix the second structures to the first structures during extension, forming a rigid body and allowing secure engagement and disengagement to ensure reliable and smooth extension and retraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If two structure assemblies are placed one upon another to form a linearly-extensible arm mechanism, then the arm can extend and retract with relatively less space requirement, but the structures may separate in their tracks and do not form a sufficiently secure rigid body

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace requirementVSAvoidrigid body formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arm mechanism is divided into multiple structure assemblies that can be separated and reconnected. Each assembly contains locking structures (protrusions and recesses) that enable secure connection when joined, while allowing easy separation when needed. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by providing both compact storage capability and secure rigid body formation during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking structures are implemented with specific local geometric features (protrusions and recesses) at critical connection points. These localized structural modifications ensure that when structure assemblies are connected, they form a secure rigid body without requiring complete redesign of the entire mechanism, thus maintaining space efficiency while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If lock parts are added to fix structure assemblies together, then rigid body formation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigid body formationVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is merged into the structural design itself through integrated protrusions and recesses that are part of the structure assemblies. This eliminates the need for separate locking mechanisms or additional components, thereby improving rigid body formation without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure assemblies are designed to self-lock through their inherent geometric features (protrusions fitting into recesses). The locking action occurs automatically when the assemblies are positioned together, without requiring external locking devices or complex control systems, thus maintaining simplicity while ensuring reliable rigid body formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10005189B2Extensible and retractable arm mechanism, and robot arm
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 LIFE ROBOTICS CO LTD
  • US10005189B2 patent drawing
  • US10005189B2 patent drawing
  • US10005189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An extendable and retractable arm mechanism includes a first structure group formed by coupling a plurality of first structures and a second structure group formed by coupling a plurality of second structures. Each of the first structures includes lock part for fixing the second structures. When the first structure group and the second structure group extend, the lock part fixes the second structures to the first structures.