Robot Balancer Adapter for Torque Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robots with rotational arms face challenges in efficiently managing load torque and maintaining structural integrity due to limitations in balancer placement and adapter design, which affects their operational stability and size.

Innovation Solution

A robot design featuring a pair of flange portions with an adapter that positions the balancer's attachment axis radially inside the flange surfaces and decentered with respect to the axis, utilizing a compression coil spring balancer and an attachable/detachable adapter to manage load torque and reduce the stroke of the balancer's rod, thereby enhancing rigidity and reducing the size of the balancer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the balancer is positioned with its attachment axis at the outer circumferential surface of the flange portions, then the stroke of the balancer's rod can be longer, but the overall size of the balancer increases and the rigidity of the structure decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestroke of balancer rodVSAvoidsize of balancer
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment axis of the balancer is positioned radially inside the flange portions rather than at the outer circumferential surface, utilizing the internal radial space of the flange structure. This dimensional repositioning allows the balancer rod to achieve sufficient stroke length while keeping the balancer compact and maintaining structural rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the balancer attachment axis is positioned radially inside the flange portions, then the rigidity and compactness improve, but the stroke of the balancer rod becomes shorter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize of balancerVSAvoidstroke of balancer rod
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The adapter introduces asymmetric positioning of the balancer attachment axis relative to the flange portions, placing it at a decentered position radially inside the flange. This asymmetric arrangement optimizes the stroke length within the constrained radial space, achieving both compactness and sufficient stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Stability of the object's composition

If the balancer is permanently fixed to the robot structure, then the structural integrity is improved, but the ease of maintenance and replacement decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of balancer replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The balancer system is segmented into separable components: the balancer itself and the adapter that connects it to the robot structure. This segmentation allows the balancer to be easily detached and replaced by simply removing the adapter, while the adapter remains permanently fixed to maintain structural integrity during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Force

If the adapter is designed to position the balancer attachment axis decentered with respect to the rotation axis, then the load torque management is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload torque managementVSAvoidadapter design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adapter serves as an intermediary component between the robot structure and the balancer. It mediates the positioning of the balancer attachment axis at a decentered location radially inside the flange portions, optimizing load torque management while keeping the adapter design relatively simple through standardized mounting features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces the overall length of the compression coil spring, allowing for increased auxiliary torque without increasing the size of the balancer, while maintaining firm support and allowing easy attachment/detachment of the balancer without removing other components, thus improving the robot's stability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a balancer that reduces a load torque acting on the motor by utilizing the elastic force of a compression coil spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12070855B2Robot
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 FANUC LTD
  • US12070855B2 patent drawing
  • US12070855B2 patent drawing
  • US12070855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot includes a first member and a second member that is rotationally driven about a prescribed axis with respect to the first member. The second member includes a pair of axially spaced-apart flange portions. The second member is supported by the respective flange portions so as to be rotatable about the axis. The robot also includes a balancer that is attached to the first member and the second member so as to be respectively rotatable about attachment axes that are parallel to the axis. In addition, the robot includes an adapter that is inserted between the pair of flange portions. The adapter is attached to the second member in an attachable/detachable manner and disposes the attachment axis of the balancer for the second member at a position that is radially farther inside than outer circumferential surfaces of the flange portions and that is decentered with respect to the axis.