Robot Debris Bin Flap Door Design for Pressure-Actuated Evacuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cleaning robots face challenges in efficiently evacuating debris from their bins without causing damage or reducing air flow efficiency, and existing evacuation stations require manual manipulation and generate noise during operation.

Innovation Solution

A mobile robot with a debris bin featuring a semi-spherical support structure and a flap door mechanism that opens in response to air pressure, combined with an evacuation station that uses negative air pressure and a deformable seal for efficient debris transfer and reduced noise, along with a removable conduit for easy cleaning and adaptive control systems for optimized evacuation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional door mechanism is used for the debris bin, then the structure is simple, but the door may contact external objects causing damage or blocking air flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor durabilityVSAvoiddoor mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door unit is nested within the exterior surface of the mobile robot, with the flap contained inside a recessed cavity. This nesting arrangement ensures the door mechanism does not protrude outward, eliminating contact damage risks while maintaining structural simplicity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The door mechanism transitions from a traditional planar door to a three-dimensional flap system that moves within a recessed cavity. The semi-spherical support structure enables the flap to pivot in a controlled arc, utilizing spatial dimensionality to achieve reliable sealing without external protrusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If manual manipulation is required for evacuation station operation, then device complexity is reduced, but user interaction increases and noise generation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated operationVSAvoidevacuation station complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evacuation station implements automated operation through a control system that autonomously manages the motor, pressure sensor, and conduit mechanisms. The system self-regulates the evacuation process by monitoring air pressure and controlling debris transfer without requiring user intervention, thereby reducing operational complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure sensor provides real-time feedback to the control system, enabling automated adjustment of the evacuation process. The control system uses this feedback to optimize motor operation and timing, achieving ease of operation through intelligent control while managing device complexity through coordinated sensor-actuator systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If evacuation time is extended to ensure complete debris removal, then evacuation thoroughness improves, but power consumption and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevacuation efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The evacuation process uses periodic motor operation controlled by the pressure sensor feedback system. The motor operates in cycles, activating when debris needs evacuation and pausing when the air pressure differential is sufficient, thereby achieving thorough evacuation with reduced power consumption and noise through intermittent rather than continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for evacuation by first establishing the negative air pressure differential through the motor, then uses this pre-established pressure field to efficiently remove debris. This preliminary action of creating the pressure gradient enables faster, more energy-efficient evacuation compared to continuous motor operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures efficient debris evacuation without contact damage, improves air flow, reduces noise, and minimizes user manipulation, while adapting evacuation time for power efficiency and reduced noise generation.

Implementation Method 1

a motor that is responsive to commands from the control system to remove air from the canister and thereby generate negative air pressure in the canister to evacuate the debris bin by suctioning the debris from the debris bin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative air pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a deformable seal for efficient debris transfer and reduced noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformable seal: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

a pressure sensor to monitor the air pressure. The control system is programmed to control an amount of time to evacuate the debris bin based on the air pressure monitored by the pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS12256876B2Evacuation station
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 IROBOT CORP
  • US12256876B2 patent drawing
  • US12256876B2 patent drawing
  • US12256876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile robot includes a body configured to traverse a surface and to receive debris from the surface, and a debris bin within the body. The debris bin includes a chamber to hold the debris received by the mobile robot, an exhaust port through which the debris exits the debris bin; and a door unit over the exhaust port. The door unit includes a flap configured to move, in response to air pressure at the exhaust port, between a closed position to cover the exhaust port and an open position to open a path between the chamber and the exhaust port. The door unit, including the flap in the open position and in the closed position, is within an exterior surface of the mobile robot.