Robot Force Control Tuning Across Multiple Error Directions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot systems face challenges in optimizing force control parameters, leading to potential robot oscillation and production quality issues, especially when adjusting parameters based on varying position and posture error conditions.

Innovation Solution

A robot system with a control device that automatically adjusts force control parameters by moving the workpiece from multiple posture error directions, ensuring optimal parameter settings that prevent robot oscillation and ensure successful task execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If force control parameters are automatically adjusted based on a single position and posture error condition, then the adjustment process is simple and quick, but the adjusted parameters are not optimized and may cause robot oscillation or work failure under different error conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment speedVSAvoidrobot operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the parameter adjustment process into multiple independent trials, each conducted under different position and posture error conditions. The control device performs force control parameter adjustment separately for each error condition, then integrates the results to determine optimal parameters, ensuring both efficiency and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the parameter adjustment from a single error condition to multiple error conditions by adding the dimension of error direction variation. By adjusting parameters across different posture error directions (e.g., radial, tangential, axial directions), the system ensures optimized performance under diverse operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If force control parameters are adjusted on conditions with high oscillation limit, then the adjustment is easier, but the robot may oscillate during production affecting quality or causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment easeVSAvoidrobot oscillation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary parameter adjustment trials under controlled error conditions before actual production. By pre-adjusting parameters under various error conditions and evaluating the results, the system identifies optimal parameters that prevent oscillation during actual production operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the control device monitors robot behavior and work quality during parameter adjustment trials. Based on feedback from multiple error conditions, the system iteratively refines parameters to eliminate oscillation issues before production deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If force control parameters are not checked on multiple position and posture error conditions, then the checking process is simplified, but the searching may fail during production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechecking process complexityVSAvoidwork quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the checking process into multiple independent verification steps, each targeting specific error conditions. The control device checks parameter effectiveness separately for different position and posture error scenarios, ensuring comprehensive validation without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs parameter checking under more error conditions than the minimum single condition, applying partial checks for each error type. This excessive action ensures that parameters are robust enough to handle unexpected variations during production, preventing work failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12337479B2Robot system and robot control device
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 FANUC LTD
  • US12337479B2 patent drawing
  • US12337479B2 patent drawing
  • US12337479B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention makes it possible, in force control during production, to automatically adjust a force control parameter optimally so as not to cause oscillation of a robot or failure of work. This robot system comprises: a robot arm having a hand at the end thereof for holding a workpiece; a force detector for detecting a force and moment received by the workpiece held by the hand; and a control device for moving the workpiece held by the hand with respect to a target object while performing force control of the robot arm to correct a position error and an attitude error of the workpiece, on the basis of a predetermined force control parameter and a detected value of the force detector. The control device has a parameter automatic adjustment unit for automatically adjusting the force control parameter by executing the moving of the workpiece with respect to the target object a plurality of times. The parameter automatic adjustment unit automatically adjusts the force control parameter by executing the moving of the workpiece with respect to the target object from a plurality of attitude error directions among a plurality of position error directions and the plurality of attitude error directions.