Robot Head Part with Three Rotational Degrees of Freedom

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing social robots lack the ability to perform dynamic head rotations based on user voice interactions, limiting their capacity for effective human-robot interaction.

Innovation Solution

A robot apparatus with a head part that has three rotational degrees of freedom, driven by a plurality of motors, and controlled by a processor that performs voice recognition and determines interaction information to execute corresponding rotation operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a robot is designed with three rotational degrees of freedom for the head part, then the robot's ability to perform nuanced head movements in response to user voice is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple motors and mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead movement capabilityVSAvoiddriving device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The head part is divided into multiple independently controllable rotational segments with three degrees of freedom (pitch, yaw, roll), each driven by dedicated motors. This segmentation allows nuanced head movements for better user interaction while organizing complexity into modular, manageable units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The driving device with three rotational degrees of freedom serves multiple functions: it enables the robot to track user position, perform expressive head gestures, and maintain proper orientation. This multi-functionality justifies the increased complexity by consolidating multiple capabilities into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If voice recognition processing is implemented to determine interaction information, then the robot's response accuracy to user voice is improved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processor performs voice recognition processing and determines interaction information in advance before executing the corresponding head rotation operations. This preliminary processing allows the robot to prepare appropriate responses, reducing overall latency in user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where the processor continuously receives user voice, performs recognition, determines interaction intent, and adjusts head movements in real-time. This feedback loop enables accurate, context-aware responses while optimizing processing efficiency through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12296458B2Robot apparatus and controlling method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12296458B2 patent drawing
  • US12296458B2 patent drawing
  • US12296458B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot apparatus includes a body part; a head part rotatably connected to the body part and having three rotational degrees of freedom; a driving device including a plurality of motors configured to provide rotational force to the head part in a pitch direction, a roll direction, and a yaw direction to drive movement of the head part; a microphone sensor configured to detect a voice of a user; and a processor configured to perform a voice recognition processing on the voice detected from the microphone sensor to obtain a recognition result, determine interaction information based on the recognition result, and control the driving device to perform a rotation operation on the head part corresponding to the interaction information.