Contracting Vector Field Control for Robot Imitation Under Dynamic Obstacles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot control techniques using time-indexed trajectories are inefficient in terms of time and robot wear, and are not well-suited for dynamic environments, particularly when dealing with obstacles.

Innovation Solution

A dynamical systems approach using contraction theory and semidefinite programming to generate a polynomial contracting vector field (CVF-P) for robot motion control, allowing for real-time adaptation to dynamic obstacles and ensuring convergence to demonstrated behavior within a safety tube.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a time-indexed trajectory control policy is used, then the robot can follow a predetermined path, but the traversal time is excessive and robot wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory following accuracyVSAvoidtrajectory traversal time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static time-indexed trajectory into a dynamic vector field that guides robot motion. Instead of following predetermined waypoints at fixed time intervals, the robot responds to continuous spatial gradients in the vector field, enabling adaptive speed adjustments and direct path optimization that reduces traversal time while maintaining trajectory accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from time-indexed position commands to spatial vector field gradients. By representing the trajectory as a polynomial vector field where motion direction and magnitude are derived from spatial derivatives, the system enables continuous adaptation of motion parameters (velocity, acceleration) to minimize traversal time while preserving path fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a simple time-indexed control policy is used, then the control implementation is straightforward, but the robot cannot adapt to dynamic obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol policy simplicityVSAvoiddynamic environment adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The vector field representation is inherently dynamic and can be updated in real-time to reflect changing environmental conditions. When obstacles appear, the polynomial coefficients of the vector field are adjusted to create repulsive gradients, guiding the robot around obstacles while maintaining continuous motion guidance without requiring complex reactive control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The polynomial vector field serves multiple functions simultaneously: it encodes the desired trajectory, provides collision-free guidance through gradient descent, and enables real-time obstacle avoidance by modifying polynomial coefficients. This unified representation eliminates the need for separate path planning and obstacle avoidance modules, maintaining implementation simplicity while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If imitation learning is used to capture demonstrated trajectories, then the robot can learn from demonstrations, but the imitation loss is high without optimal fitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimitation lossVSAvoidfitting method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical fitting approaches (regression analysis, stochastic gradient descent) with semidefinite programming based on sum-of-squares relaxation. This algebraic method directly computes the optimal polynomial coefficients that minimize imitation loss, providing globally optimal solutions without the iterative approximation and local minima issues inherent in gradient-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optimization approach from iterative numerical methods to closed-form algebraic solutions using sum-of-squares decomposition. By formulating the polynomial fitting problem in terms of semidefinite constraints and using convex optimization, the system achieves globally optimal parameter estimation that minimizes imitation loss while maintaining computational efficiency and avoiding the complexity of non-convex optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11420328B2Generating a robot control policy from demonstrations
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11420328B2 patent drawing
  • US11420328B2 patent drawing
  • US11420328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Learning to effectively imitate human teleoperators, even in unseen, dynamic environments is a promising path to greater autonomy, enabling robots to steadily acquire complex skills from supervision. Various motion generation techniques are described herein that are rooted in contraction theory and sum-of-squares programming for learning a dynamical systems control policy in the form of a polynomial vector field from a given set of demonstrations. Notably, this vector field is provably optimal for the problem of minimizing imitation loss while providing certain continuous-time guarantees on the induced imitation behavior. Techniques herein generalize to new initial and goal poses of the robot and can adapt in real time to dynamic obstacles during execution, with convergence to teleoperator behavior within a well-defined safety tube.