Robot Arm Interlock Control Using Door Closure and Trigger Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot systems lack sufficient safety measures, particularly when power is turned ON, as interlocks may not operate when the cover is open, posing a risk of robot operation with potential human contact.

Innovation Solution

A robot control system with an opening/closing detection section, signal transmission, and a control apparatus that acquires and determines a safety confirmation state based on both an opening/closing signal and a trigger signal before permitting robot operation, ensuring the opening/closing door is closed and safety confirmation is visually confirmed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the interlock operates only when power is turned ON, then the system is simple to operate, but safety is insufficient as the robot may operate even when the cover is open

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary safety checks before permitting robot operation. When power is turned ON, the control apparatus checks whether the cover is closed and whether a release operation has been performed before allowing the interlock to operate, preventing robot operation when the cover is open

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the control apparatus continuously monitors the cover opening/closing state and release operation status, and uses this information to control whether the robot can operate, ensuring safety through state-dependent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the interlock operates when power is turned ON regardless of cover state, then the system is easy to operate, but the robot may operate with potential human contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidhuman contact risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before the robot can operate after power is turned ON, the system requires preliminary conditions to be met: the cover must be closed and a release operation must be performed. This preliminary check prevents the robot from operating when the cover is open, eliminating human contact risk while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If no release operation is required when cover is open, then the system is simple, but high safety cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control apparatus monitors the cover opening/closing state and release operation status, and uses this feedback to determine whether to permit robot operation. This feedback-based control ensures high safety by preventing operation when the cover is open, while keeping the control mechanism relatively simple through state-based decision logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260027719A1Robot control system, robot control apparatus, and control method
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US20260027719A1 patent drawing
  • US20260027719A1 patent drawing
  • US20260027719A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a robot control apparatus including: an opening/closing signal acquisition section that acquires an opening/closing signal; a trigger signal acquisition section that acquires a trigger signal; and a determination section that defines, as a safety confirmation state, a case where, when power is supplied to the robot control apparatus, an opening/closing detection section detects that the closed state is achieved based on an opening/closing signal acquired by the opening/closing signal acquisition section, and the trigger signal acquisition section acquires the trigger signal, and determines whether or not the safety confirmation state is achieved, in which the robot control apparatus permits an operation of the robot arm when the determination section determines that the safety confirmation state is achieved, and prohibits an operation of the robot arm when the determination section determines that the safety confirmation state is not achieved.