Robot Joint Structure Mimicking Human Finger Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robot designs fail to effectively mimic human finger motion and respond to external forces, lacking the necessary components and sensors to replicate the functionality of human fingers.

Innovation Solution

A joint structure for robots comprising a body part, a link structure with multiple links, a sensor unit, and actuators connected by wires, where the sensor unit measures tension to control the link structure's movement, mimicking human finger motion and grip functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If robot is equipped with components corresponding to muscles, tendons, and fingers to mimic human motion, then the robot can replicate human finger motion, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman finger motion mimicryVSAvoidcomponents structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic finger is divided into multiple links (first link, second link, third link) connected by joints, with separate actuators for each degree of freedom. This segmentation allows independent control of each finger segment, enabling complex human-like finger motions while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator unit is designed as a universal module that can be applied to multiple joints in the robotic finger. Each actuator unit includes an actuator, wire, and sensor that work together as a standardized assembly, allowing the same basic structure to control different finger joints (IP joint, DIP joint) with similar control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If sensor unit is added to measure tension in the wire, then the robot can respond to external forces, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal force responseVSAvoidsensor unit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A sensor unit is integrated into each actuator assembly to detect tension in the wire and provide feedback signals to the control unit. This feedback mechanism enables the robotic finger to sense external forces applied to it and adjust its position or grip force accordingly, improving reliability and natural interaction while the integration keeps the added complexity minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor unit is combined with the actuator and wire assembly into a single integrated module. Rather than being a separate component, the sensor is incorporated into the existing actuator structure, allowing force sensing functionality to be added without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple links and actuators are used to control finger motion, then the robot can achieve precise grip, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip precisionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic finger is divided into multiple links (first link, second link, third link) connected by joints, with separate actuators for each degree of freedom. This segmentation allows independent control of each finger segment, enabling complex human-like finger motions while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The joint structure efficiently mimics human finger motion and responds to external forces, allowing the robot to grip objects effectively by controlling tension in the wires, enhancing the robot's ability to interact with its environment.

Implementation Method 1

the sensor unit may measure tension applied to the first wire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Implementation Method 2

an actuator fixed to one side of the body part and connected to the other end of the first wire to move the other end of the first wire in a vertical direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

The reaction force providing portion may include a spring member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12049000B2Joint structure for robot and robot including the same
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12049000B2 patent drawing
  • US12049000B2 patent drawing
  • US12049000B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a joint structure for a robot including: a body part; a link structure connected to an upper portion of the body part and including multiple links; a sensor unit provided on one end of the link structure; a first wire having one end connected to the sensor unit; and an actuator fixed to one side of the body part and connected to the other end of the first wire to move the other end of the first wire in a vertical direction, wherein the sensor unit measures tension applied to the first wire.