Robot Leg Design Reducing Weight and Power via Passive Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Legged robots often require a large number of powered joints for three-dimensional motion, leading to increased weight, power consumption, and stability issues due to backlash in degrees of freedom, making them inefficient and unstable for walking.

Innovation Solution

A leg design for legged robots with three or fewer actuated degrees of freedom, utilizing a hip joint and knee joint configuration that maintains the upper and lower linkages parallel, with a compliant or universal joint connecting the foot to the ankle, allowing for motion in multiple planes with reduced joint complexity and power requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of powered joints are used to achieve three-dimensional motion, then the robot can produce locomotive behavior through stepping motions, but the weight of the robot increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional motion capabilityVSAvoidrobot weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary degrees of freedom from the traditional six-DOF leg design. By removing redundant joints and using passive compliance mechanisms instead of active actuators, the design reduces the number of powered joints from six to three per leg, directly reducing robot weight while maintaining essential locomotion capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of joint actuation from fully powered to partially passive. By implementing passive compliance in certain joints (allowing them to move without active motors), the system reduces the number of powered joints needed, thereby reducing weight while preserving three-dimensional motion capability through the remaining actuated joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If more joints are actuated to provide three-dimensional motion, then the robot can achieve greater motion freedom, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion freedomVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes unnecessary active actuation from joints that can function effectively with passive compliance. By extracting the motorization from certain joints and relying on mechanical compliance and gravity, the system reduces power consumption while maintaining motion freedom in the essential degrees of freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The passive compliant joints serve themselves by utilizing mechanical properties (compliance, gravity, elasticity) rather than requiring external power sources. This self-service mechanism allows joints to move and adapt without consuming electrical energy, reducing overall power consumption while preserving motion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple degrees of freedom are implemented in the hip and ankle joints, then the robot can shift weight in the coronal plane for locomotion, but backlash in these joints reduces stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight shifting capabilityVSAvoidrobot stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex multi-DOF powered joints with simpler, more reliable alternatives. By using passive compliance and fewer actuated joints, the system eliminates backlash-prone mechanisms while maintaining weight shifting capability through the remaining stable, well-controlled degrees of freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Adaptability or versatility

If three degree of freedom hip joints are used for sagittal, coronal, and transverse plane motion, then the robot can achieve comprehensive motion, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive motionVSAvoidjoint configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes redundant degrees of freedom from the hip joint configuration. By eliminating the transverse plane rotation joint and relying on passive compliance in other joints, the system reduces hip joint complexity from three DOFs to two actuated DOFs while maintaining comprehensive motion capability through the combination of remaining active joints and passive compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11192600B2Robot leg
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 ROBOTICAL LTD
  • US11192600B2 patent drawing
  • US11192600B2 patent drawing
  • US11192600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot leg (125) comprises an upper link (101) and a lower link (111). The upper link (101) operates nominally in a first vertical plane, for example the sagittal plane, while the lower link (111) operates nominally in a second vertical plane, nominally orthogonal to the first plane, for example the coronal plane. The leg (125) may also comprise a twist joint in the knee, and may comprise four-bar linkages (102a-b, 103a-d, 112a-b, 113a-d), such that the foot (106) stays parallel to the hip (102a). The leg (125) may be used in a robot to allow the construction of a robot capable of three dimensional movement, using a small number of actuators per leg.