Robot Linking Extension for Coordinated Heavy Object Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing and building robots that can efficiently lift and move large or heavy objects is challenging due to the complexity and cost associated with such tasks, especially when automation is required in various environments.

Innovation Solution

The development of robots with a linking extension that allows multiple robots to be linked together, enabling coordinated movement and grasping of objects through a pivot member, mobility subsystem, and robotic arm, which minimizes complexity and cost by allowing robots to work together to handle heavy or large objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a single robot is designed to lift and move large or heavy objects, then the robot must have high strength and power, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidrobot structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the lifting task among multiple robots instead of requiring one robot to handle the entire load. Each robot contributes a portion of the lifting force, allowing individual robots to have simpler structures while collectively achieving high lifting capacity. The linking extension segments the connection between robots, enabling modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple robots are combined through linking extensions to work as a coordinated team. The merging of multiple robotic systems allows the team to collectively lift and move objects that would be too heavy or large for a single robot, while each individual robot maintains a simpler design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Force

If a single robot is designed to lift and move large or heavy objects, then the robot must have high strength and power, but the manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the lifting function across multiple standard robots rather than manufacturing one specialized heavy-duty robot. This allows use of off-the-shelf robotic components, reducing manufacturing costs while achieving the required lifting capacity through coordinated effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The linking extension mechanism provides universal functionality that can connect various robot types and configurations. This multi-functional approach allows the same linking mechanism to be used across different robot models, reducing overall system cost and improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Force

If multiple robots are linked together to perform coordinated tasks, then the ability to handle heavy objects improves, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollective lifting capacityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control subsystems of linked robots communicate and coordinate their movements through feedback mechanisms. Each robot monitors its own position and force contribution, adjusting its actions based on feedback from other linked robots to maintain synchronized operation and balanced load distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control systems of multiple robots are merged into a coordinated operation where robots work as a unified team. The linking extension physically connects the robots, and the control systems logically connect them through communication protocols, enabling synchronized movement and force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If robots are designed with linking extensions for autonomous linking, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous linking capabilityVSAvoidlinking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linking extension mechanism enables robots to autonomously connect and disconnect from each other without human intervention. The distal end of one robot's linking extension automatically couples with the coupling member of another robot, and can be easily released when needed, providing self-service linking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The linking extension incorporates rotational freedom at the proximal end, allowing the connection to dynamically adapt to different robot positions and orientations. This dynamic capability enables autonomous linking while maintaining operational flexibility, as the linking mechanism can accommodate movement and positioning variations automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables robots to securely grasp and lift heavy or large objects by coordinating the movement of multiple robots, reducing the complexity and cost of individual robot design and allowing for autonomous linking and unlinking, thus enhancing their ability to handle diverse tasks in various environments.

Implementation Method 1

a proximal end that is rotatably coupled to the pivot member of the body of the robot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotation:

Data Source

PatentUS10646993B1Robots linkable to perform tasks in coordinated teams
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US10646993B1 patent drawing
  • US10646993B1 patent drawing
  • US10646993B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot may include (1) a body having a pivot member, (2) a mobility subsystem, coupled to the body of the robot, that provides omnidirectional displacement of the robot along a plane, (3) a robotic arm, coupled to the body of the robot, for manipulating an object, and (4) a linking extension. The linking extension may include (1) a proximal end that is rotatably coupled to the pivot member of the body of the robot, and (2) a distal end that is dimensioned to rotatably couple to a coupling member of an assistant robot such that the linking extension links the robot and the assistant robot. The robot may also include a control subsystem, communicatively coupled to the mobility subsystem, that coordinates displacement of the robot by the mobility subsystem with displacement of the assistant robot. Various other apparatuses, systems, and methods are also disclosed.