Robotic social interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems face challenges in effectively interacting with humans in dynamic environments, as human behavior is complex and difficult to predict, leading to inefficiencies and potential conflicts.

Innovation Solution

The development of a robotic system capable of autonomously navigating and interacting with humans by using sensor data to predict human paths and adjust its own path to avoid humans, while also being able to identify and respond to human roles and instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot autonomously navigates using sensor data to determine paths, then the robot can efficiently traverse the physical environment, but the robot may collide with or interfere with human activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot traversal efficiencyVSAvoidconflict with human activities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs preliminary identification of humans in the environment and predicts their future paths before executing its own navigation. By anticipating human movements in advance, the robot can plan its traversal to avoid conflicts, maintaining both efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The robot dynamically adjusts its traversal path based on real-time sensor data and predicted human movements. Instead of following a fixed predetermined path, the robot continuously updates its navigation to accommodate human activities, resolving the conflict between efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the robot uses complex prediction algorithms to forecast human paths, then the robot can avoid humans more accurately, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman path prediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot applies prediction algorithms selectively rather than universally. It focuses computational resources on predicting paths of humans who are most likely to intersect with the robot's traversal, rather than attempting to predict all human movements with equal detail, thus balancing accuracy with complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensor data as an intermediary between direct human observation and path prediction. The sensors provide processed information about human positions and movements, which the prediction algorithm then uses to forecast future paths, simplifying the computational task while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the robot continuously monitors and updates paths to avoid humans, then the robot can maintain safe distances, but the robot's traversal speed and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety distance maintenanceVSAvoidtraversal speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot determines safe paths in advance by predicting human movements before traversal begins. This preliminary path planning allows the robot to maintain safety distances without continuous real-time adjustments, thereby preserving traversal speed while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the robot identifies human roles and communication modes, then the robot can improve social interaction quality, but the identification and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesocial interaction capabilityVSAvoididentification processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robot applies full human identification and role analysis only when necessary for task execution or safety. For routine interactions, the robot uses simplified identification methods, reducing processing time while maintaining adequate social interaction capability for the specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables robots to interact with humans in a socially aware manner, avoiding conflicts and improving efficiency by predicting human movements and adjusting their actions accordingly.

Implementation Method 1

autonomously positioning an ultraviolet light source in proximity with the designated surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet light emission: Light

Data Source

PatentUS12311070B2Robotic social interaction
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ROBUST AI INC
  • US12311070B2 patent drawing
  • US12311070B2 patent drawing
  • US12311070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot may identify a human located proximate to the robot in a physical environment based on sensor data captured from one or more sensors on the robot. A trajectory of the human through space may be predicted. When the predicted trajectory of the human intersects with a current path of the robot, an updated path to a destination location in the environment may be determined so as to avoid a collision between the robot and the human along the predicted trajectory. The robot may then move along the determined path.